15-74893329-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_002435.3(MPI):c.670+9A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.509 in 1,613,370 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 218,919 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.45 ( 16246 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.52 ( 202673 hom. )
Consequence
MPI
NM_002435.3 intron
NM_002435.3 intron
Scores
10
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.68
Genes affected
MPI (HGNC:7216): (mannose phosphate isomerase) Phosphomannose isomerase catalyzes the interconversion of fructose-6-phosphate and mannose-6-phosphate and plays a critical role in maintaining the supply of D-mannose derivatives, which are required for most glycosylation reactions. Mutations in the MPI gene were found in patients with carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome, type Ib. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=6.217839E-5).
BP6
Variant 15-74893329-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-74893329-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 94069.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-74893329-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.532 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPI | NM_002435.3 | c.670+9A>G | intron_variant | ENST00000352410.9 | NP_002426.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPI | ENST00000352410.9 | c.670+9A>G | intron_variant | 1 | NM_002435.3 | ENSP00000318318 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.448 AC: 68103AN: 151966Hom.: 16226 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
68103
AN:
151966
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.443 AC: 110737AN: 249742Hom.: 26725 AF XY: 0.433 AC XY: 58558AN XY: 135140
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
110737
AN:
249742
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
58558
AN XY:
135140
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.515 AC: 752597AN: 1461284Hom.: 202673 Cov.: 40 AF XY: 0.505 AC XY: 366969AN XY: 726964
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
752597
AN:
1461284
Hom.:
Cov.:
40
AF XY:
AC XY:
366969
AN XY:
726964
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.448 AC: 68177AN: 152086Hom.: 16246 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.438 AC XY: 32554AN XY: 74362
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
68177
AN:
152086
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
32554
AN XY:
74362
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
2145
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
2178
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1428
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
4690
ExAC
AF:
AC:
52990
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
801
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
MPI-congenital disorder of glycosylation Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 10, 2012 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: 44% of total chromosomes in ExAC - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 03, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MutationTaster
Benign
P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P
PROVEAN
Benign
N
Sift
Benign
T
Sift4G
Benign
T
Vest4
GERP RS
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at