15-74893329-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_002435.3(MPI):​c.670+9A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.509 in 1,613,370 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 218,919 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.45 ( 16246 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.52 ( 202673 hom. )

Consequence

MPI
NM_002435.3 intron

Scores

10

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.68

Publications

23 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MPI (HGNC:7216): (mannose phosphate isomerase) Phosphomannose isomerase catalyzes the interconversion of fructose-6-phosphate and mannose-6-phosphate and plays a critical role in maintaining the supply of D-mannose derivatives, which are required for most glycosylation reactions. Mutations in the MPI gene were found in patients with carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome, type Ib. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]
MPI Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • MPI-congenital disorder of glycosylation
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, Myriad Women’s Health, G2P, ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=6.217839E-5).
BP6
Variant 15-74893329-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-74893329-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 94069.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.532 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002435.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MPI
NM_002435.3
MANE Select
c.670+9A>G
intron
N/ANP_002426.1
MPI
NM_001330372.2
c.610+9A>G
intron
N/ANP_001317301.1
MPI
NM_001289156.2
c.520+9A>G
intron
N/ANP_001276085.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MPI
ENST00000352410.9
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.670+9A>G
intron
N/AENSP00000318318.6
MPI
ENST00000323744.10
TSL:1
c.487+527A>G
intron
N/AENSP00000318192.6
MPI
ENST00000563422.5
TSL:1
c.670+9A>G
intron
N/AENSP00000457885.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.448
AC:
68103
AN:
151966
Hom.:
16226
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.339
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.434
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.514
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.469
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.230
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.192
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.429
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.411
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.537
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.442
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.443
AC:
110737
AN:
249742
AF XY:
0.433
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.332
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.520
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.463
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.220
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.432
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.537
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.473
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.515
AC:
752597
AN:
1461284
Hom.:
202673
Cov.:
40
AF XY:
0.505
AC XY:
366969
AN XY:
726964
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.331
AC:
11060
AN:
33462
American (AMR)
AF:
0.523
AC:
23355
AN:
44686
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.468
AC:
12238
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.245
AC:
9716
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.208
AC:
17932
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.438
AC:
23389
AN:
53406
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.407
AC:
2346
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.561
AC:
623414
AN:
1111496
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.483
AC:
29147
AN:
60378
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.485
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
19889
39778
59666
79555
99444
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
17282
34564
51846
69128
86410
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.448
AC:
68177
AN:
152086
Hom.:
16246
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.438
AC XY:
32554
AN XY:
74362
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.339
AC:
14079
AN:
41476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.514
AC:
7859
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.469
AC:
1628
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.230
AC:
1187
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.192
AC:
926
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.429
AC:
4544
AN:
10580
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.415
AC:
122
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.537
AC:
36499
AN:
67972
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.444
AC:
938
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1913
3826
5738
7651
9564
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
612
1224
1836
2448
3060
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.499
Hom.:
31516
Bravo
AF:
0.458
TwinsUK
AF:
0.578
AC:
2145
ALSPAC
AF:
0.565
AC:
2178
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.325
AC:
1428
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.546
AC:
4690
ExAC
AF:
0.436
AC:
52990
Asia WGS
AF:
0.229
AC:
801
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.524
EpiControl
AF:
0.523

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

MPI-congenital disorder of glycosylation Benign:5
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:5
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 10, 2012
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: 44% of total chromosomes in ExAC

Dec 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

not provided Benign:1
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.064
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.53
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
CADD
Benign
4.6
DANN
Benign
0.97
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.026
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.20
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.000062
T
PhyloP100
-1.7
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N
Sift
Benign
0.51
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.43
T
Vest4
0.030
GERP RS
-0.38
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.070
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7495739; hg19: chr15-75185670; COSMIC: COSV60396694; COSMIC: COSV60396694; API