15-80159830-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000137.4(FAH):​c.267G>C​(p.Leu89Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0797 in 1,614,142 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5,166 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.075 ( 431 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.080 ( 4735 hom. )

Consequence

FAH
NM_000137.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.56

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
FAH (HGNC:3579): (fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase) Predicted to enable fumarylacetoacetase activity. Predicted to be involved in L-phenylalanine catabolic process; homogentisate catabolic process; and tyrosine catabolic process. Predicted to act upstream of or within arginine catabolic process. Located in extracellular exosome. Implicated in tyrosinemia type I. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
FAH Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • tyrosinemia type I
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.64).
BP6
Variant 15-80159830-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-80159830-G-C is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 92444.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.56 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0809 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FAHNM_000137.4 linkc.267G>C p.Leu89Leu synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 14 ENST00000561421.6 NP_000128.1 P16930-1A0A384P5L6
FAHNM_001374377.1 linkc.267G>C p.Leu89Leu synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 15 NP_001361306.1
FAHNM_001374380.1 linkc.267G>C p.Leu89Leu synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 15 NP_001361309.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FAHENST00000561421.6 linkc.267G>C p.Leu89Leu synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 14 1 NM_000137.4 ENSP00000453347.2 P16930-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0745
AC:
11339
AN:
152196
Hom.:
429
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0764
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.139
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0718
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0223
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0881
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0539
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0759
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0805
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0626
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0735
AC:
18492
AN:
251458
AF XY:
0.0738
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0764
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0847
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0614
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0231
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0541
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0799
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0728
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0803
AC:
117372
AN:
1461828
Hom.:
4735
Cov.:
41
AF XY:
0.0803
AC XY:
58421
AN XY:
727214
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0759
AC:
2541
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0809
AC:
3617
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0607
AC:
1587
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0295
AC:
1173
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0888
AC:
7659
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0538
AC:
2872
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0702
AC:
405
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0837
AC:
93036
AN:
1111954
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0742
AC:
4482
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.462
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6075
12150
18224
24299
30374
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
3452
6904
10356
13808
17260
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0745
AC:
11354
AN:
152314
Hom.:
431
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0730
AC XY:
5434
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0766
AC:
3186
AN:
41580
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0717
AC:
1098
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0576
AC:
200
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0226
AC:
117
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0877
AC:
424
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0539
AC:
572
AN:
10604
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0782
AC:
23
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0805
AC:
5476
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0620
AC:
131
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
555
1110
1665
2220
2775
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
132
264
396
528
660
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0763
Hom.:
152
Bravo
AF:
0.0764
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0510
AC:
177
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0794
EpiControl
AF:
0.0795

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tyrosinemia type I Benign:4
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Dec 04, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2012
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Aug 15, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The FAH c.267G>C (p.Leu89Leu) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. Mutation Taster predicts the variant to be a polymorphism. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing, however no functional studies were published at the time of evaluation. This variant was found in 9078/121340 control chromosomes (including 353 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0748146, which is approximately 30 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic FAH variant (0.0025), suggesting this variant is likely a benign common polymorphism. In addition, one clinical diagnostic laboratory has classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.64
CADD
Benign
3.3
DANN
Benign
0.51
PhyloP100
1.6
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs33929922; hg19: chr15-80452172; COSMIC: COSV55723013; COSMIC: COSV55723013; API