15-89333596-TTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGC-TTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGC
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP3BP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001430120.1(POLGARF):c.211_213dupGCA(p.Ala71dup) variant causes a conservative inframe insertion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.102 in 1,597,358 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,315 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001430120.1 conservative_inframe_insertion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLG | NM_002693.3 | c.156_158dupGCA | p.Gln53dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 2 of 23 | ENST00000268124.11 | NP_002684.1 | |
POLGARF | NM_001430120.1 | c.211_213dupGCA | p.Ala71dup | conservative_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 2 | NP_001417049.1 | ||
POLG | NM_001126131.2 | c.156_158dupGCA | p.Gln53dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 2 of 23 | NP_001119603.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLGARF | ENST00000706918.1 | c.211_213dupGCA | p.Ala71dup | conservative_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 2 | ENSP00000516626.1 | ||||
POLG | ENST00000268124.11 | c.156_158dupGCA | p.Gln53dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 2 of 23 | 1 | NM_002693.3 | ENSP00000268124.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.124 AC: 18728AN: 151570Hom.: 1351 Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.100 AC: 144743AN: 1445684Hom.: 4961 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0993 AC XY: 71362AN XY: 718820
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.124 AC: 18748AN: 151674Hom.: 1354 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.119 AC XY: 8844AN XY: 74142
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
not provided Benign:4
- -
- -
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23066759, 29190809) -
- -
Progressive sclerosing poliodystrophy Benign:2
The NM_002693.2:c.156_158dup (NP_002684.1:p.Gln53_Gln54insGln) [GRCH38: NC_000015.10:g.89333627_89333629dup] variant in POLG gene is interpretated to be a Benign based on ACMG guidelines (PMID: 25741868). This variant meets the following evidence codes reported in the ACMG-guideline. BS1:The minor allele frequency of this allele is high for Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 4A (Alpers type). BS2:Observation of the variant in controls is inconsistent with penetrance of Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 4A (Alpers type). BP4:Computational evidence/predictors indicate no impact on the POLG structure, function, or protein-protein interaction. Based on the evidence criteria codes applied, the variant is suggested to be Benign. -
- -
Progressive sclerosing poliodystrophy;C1834846:Progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions, autosomal dominant 1;C1843851:Sensory ataxic neuropathy, dysarthria, and ophthalmoparesis;C3150914:Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 4b;C4225153:Progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions, autosomal recessive 1;C4551995:Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 1 Benign:1
- -
POLG-Related Spectrum Disorders Benign:1
- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Hereditary spastic paraplegia Benign:1
- -
Recessive mitochondrial ataxia syndrome Benign:1
Allele frequency in gnomAD v3.1 is >5% in the African/African American population dataset. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at