15-89333654-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong

The NM_002693.3(POLG):​c.101A>G​(p.Asp34Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 33)

Consequence

POLG
NM_002693.3 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.20
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLG (HGNC:9179): (DNA polymerase gamma, catalytic subunit) Mitochondrial DNA polymerase is heterotrimeric, consisting of a homodimer of accessory subunits plus a catalytic subunit. The protein encoded by this gene is the catalytic subunit of mitochondrial DNA polymerase. The encoded protein contains a polyglutamine tract near its N-terminus that may be polymorphic. Defects in this gene are a cause of progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions 1 (PEOA1), sensory ataxic neuropathy dysarthria and ophthalmoparesis (SANDO), Alpers-Huttenlocher syndrome (AHS), and mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalopathy syndrome (MNGIE). Two transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
POLGARF (HGNC:56246): (POLG alternative reading frame) This gene uses the same transcript as the POLG gene but has a CUG start codon and an alternate reading frame that makes a 260 aa protein. This protein is distinct from POLG isoforms and may interact with P32 (also known as C1QBP), a mitochondrial matrix protein thought to be involved in the expression of mitochondrial genome-encoded proteins. POLGARF protein may bind P32 and sequester it in the nucleolus. Interestingly, some disease-causing mutations thought to be in POLG may instead be associated with POLGARF. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.06211564).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
POLGNM_002693.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.101A>G p.Asp34Gly missense_variant 2/23 ENST00000268124.11 NP_002684.1
POLGARFNM_001406557.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.156A>G p.Arg52= synonymous_variant 2/23 NP_001393486.1
POLGNM_001126131.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.101A>G p.Asp34Gly missense_variant 2/23 NP_001119603.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
POLGENST00000268124.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.101A>G p.Asp34Gly missense_variant 2/231 NM_002693.3 ENSP00000268124 P1
POLGARFENST00000706918.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.156A>G p.Arg52= synonymous_variant 1/2 ENSP00000516626 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityJan 20, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 18, 2017A variant of uncertain significance has been identified in the POLG gene. The D34G variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. The D34G variant is not observed in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016; 1000 Genomes Consortium et al., 2015; Exome Variant Server). The D34G variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. However, this substitution occurs at a position that is not conserved. In silico analysis predicts this variant likely does not alter the protein structure/function. Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.073
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.24
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
6.0
DANN
Benign
0.55
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.21
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.091
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.66
.;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.15
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.062
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.59
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.050
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.18
Sift
Benign
0.63
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.36
T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;B
Vest4
0.042
MutPred
0.22
Gain of catalytic residue at D34 (P = 0.0103);Gain of catalytic residue at D34 (P = 0.0103);
MVP
0.47
MPC
0.20
ClinPred
0.027
T
GERP RS
-2.7
Varity_R
0.051
gMVP
0.22

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs779409525; hg19: chr15-89876885; API