15-89633201-T-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_198525.3(KIF7):āc.2658A>Cā(p.Ala886=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.892 in 1,603,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 641,161 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.85 ( 55566 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.90 ( 585595 hom. )
Consequence
KIF7
NM_198525.3 synonymous
NM_198525.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.05
Genes affected
KIF7 (HGNC:30497): (kinesin family member 7) This gene encodes a cilia-associated protein belonging to the kinesin family. This protein plays a role in the sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway through the regulation of GLI transcription factors. It functions as a negative regulator of the SHH pathway by preventing inappropriate activation of GLI2 in the absence of ligand, and as a positive regulator by preventing the processing of GLI3 into its repressor form. Mutations in this gene have been associated with various ciliopathies. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
Variant 15-89633201-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-89633201-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129413.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-89633201-T-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.05 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.912 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIF7 | NM_198525.3 | c.2658A>C | p.Ala886= | synonymous_variant | 13/19 | ENST00000394412.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIF7 | ENST00000394412.8 | c.2658A>C | p.Ala886= | synonymous_variant | 13/19 | 5 | NM_198525.3 | P2 | |
KIF7 | ENST00000696512.1 | c.2781A>C | p.Ala927= | synonymous_variant | 13/19 | A2 | |||
KIF7 | ENST00000677187.1 | n.332A>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.852 AC: 129491AN: 152040Hom.: 55528 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
129491
AN:
152040
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.849 AC: 200975AN: 236596Hom.: 86224 AF XY: 0.858 AC XY: 110159AN XY: 128382
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
200975
AN:
236596
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
110159
AN XY:
128382
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.896 AC: 1300671AN: 1450920Hom.: 585595 Cov.: 63 AF XY: 0.897 AC XY: 647197AN XY: 721534
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1300671
AN:
1450920
Hom.:
Cov.:
63
AF XY:
AC XY:
647197
AN XY:
721534
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.852 AC: 129582AN: 152158Hom.: 55566 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.848 AC XY: 63081AN XY: 74392
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
129582
AN:
152158
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
63081
AN XY:
74392
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2687
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:8
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 22, 2014 | - - |
Acrocallosal syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 19, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Hydrolethalus syndrome 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 19, 2021 | - - |
Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, Al-Gazali type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 19, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at