15-90769593-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000057.4(BLM):​c.2555+7T>C variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.289 in 1,612,356 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 72,224 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.36 ( 11405 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.28 ( 60819 hom. )

Consequence

BLM
NM_000057.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.001295
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.04
Variant links:
Genes affected
BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 15-90769593-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-90769593-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 92392.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-90769593-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.576 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BLMNM_000057.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2555+7T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000355112.8 NP_000048.1 P54132

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BLMENST00000355112.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.2555+7T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_000057.4 ENSP00000347232.3 P54132

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.361
AC:
54735
AN:
151730
Hom.:
11388
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.582
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.186
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.274
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.226
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.316
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.193
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.273
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.247
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.286
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.319
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.280
AC:
69977
AN:
250054
Hom.:
10864
AF XY:
0.269
AC XY:
36409
AN XY:
135158
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.597
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.233
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.235
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.316
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.179
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.271
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.277
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.264
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.281
AC:
410940
AN:
1460508
Hom.:
60819
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.277
AC XY:
201321
AN XY:
726542
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.605
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.238
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.233
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.313
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.182
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.275
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.281
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.288
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.361
AC:
54798
AN:
151848
Hom.:
11405
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.354
AC XY:
26249
AN XY:
74160
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.582
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.274
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.226
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.316
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.192
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.273
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.286
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.320
Alfa
AF:
0.306
Hom.:
7206
Bravo
AF:
0.370
Asia WGS
AF:
0.274
AC:
952
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Bloom syndrome Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Mar 28, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 06, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 29, 2013- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.83

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.0013
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3815003; hg19: chr15-91312823; COSMIC: COSV61923783; COSMIC: COSV61923783; API