15-90804233-T-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6
The ENST00000355112.8(BLM):c.3625T>A(p.Ser1209Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000265 in 1,613,966 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00028 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00026 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BLM
ENST00000355112.8 missense
ENST00000355112.8 missense
Scores
1
4
14
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.45
Genes affected
BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01722318).
BP6
Variant 15-90804233-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-90804233-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127501.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=4, Likely_benign=8}. Variant chr15-90804233-T-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | NM_000057.4 | c.3625T>A | p.Ser1209Thr | missense_variant | 19/22 | ENST00000355112.8 | NP_000048.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | ENST00000355112.8 | c.3625T>A | p.Ser1209Thr | missense_variant | 19/22 | 1 | NM_000057.4 | ENSP00000347232 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000283 AC: 43AN: 152142Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
43
AN:
152142
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000358 AC: 90AN: 251366Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000346 AC XY: 47AN XY: 135854
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
90
AN:
251366
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
135854
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000263 AC: 385AN: 1461824Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000285 AC XY: 207AN XY: 727224
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
385
AN:
1461824
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
207
AN XY:
727224
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000283 AC: 43AN: 152142Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000296 AC XY: 22AN XY: 74316
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
43
AN:
152142
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
74316
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
4
ExAC
AF:
AC:
37
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Bloom syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Apr 09, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 09, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Nov 12, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Aug 05, 2019 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | AiLife Diagnostics, AiLife Diagnostics | Jun 29, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 16, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2022 | BLM: BS1 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 07, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 22, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 10, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 06, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Nov 12, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T
Sift4G
Benign
T
Polyphen
B
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at