15-90804369-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The ENST00000355112.8(BLM):c.3751+10C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000069 in 1,608,906 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000066 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
BLM
ENST00000355112.8 intron
ENST00000355112.8 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.90
Genes affected
BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | NM_000057.4 | c.3751+10C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000355112.8 | NP_000048.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | ENST00000355112.8 | c.3751+10C>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_000057.4 | ENSP00000347232 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000985 AC: 15AN: 152232Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152232
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000155 AC: 39AN: 250836Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 17AN XY: 135698
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
39
AN:
250836
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
135698
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000659 AC: 96AN: 1456674Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000648 AC XY: 47AN XY: 725020
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
96
AN:
1456674
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
725020
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000985 AC: 15AN: 152232Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000108 AC XY: 8AN XY: 74372
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152232
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74372
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Bloom syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Mar 22, 2018 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 22, 2018 | Variant summary: BLM c.3751+10C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00014 in 245720 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BLM causing Bloom Syndrome (0.00014 vs 0.0035), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.3751+10C>T in individuals affected with Bloom Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. One laboratory classified the variant as benign/likely benign, and one laboratory classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at