15-92978374-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001271.4(CHD2):​c.2718A>G​(p.Gln906Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.832 in 1,613,670 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 562,763 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.77 ( 46139 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.84 ( 516624 hom. )

Consequence

CHD2
NM_001271.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.64
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHD2 (HGNC:1917): (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 2) The CHD family of proteins is characterized by the presence of chromo (chromatin organization modifier) domains and SNF2-related helicase/ATPase domains. CHD genes alter gene expression possibly by modification of chromatin structure thus altering access of the transcriptional apparatus to its chromosomal DNA template. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 15-92978374-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-92978374-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 257708.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-92978374-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.64 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.975 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CHD2NM_001271.4 linkc.2718A>G p.Gln906Gln synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 39 ENST00000394196.9 NP_001262.3 O14647-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHD2ENST00000394196.9 linkc.2718A>G p.Gln906Gln synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 39 5 NM_001271.4 ENSP00000377747.4 O14647-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.767
AC:
116496
AN:
151902
Hom.:
46101
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.559
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.935
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.881
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.908
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.998
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.908
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.754
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.908
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.831
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.816
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.844
AC:
210204
AN:
248986
Hom.:
89953
AF XY:
0.850
AC XY:
114551
AN XY:
134774
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.559
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.918
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.906
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.998
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.900
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.765
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.831
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.858
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.839
AC:
1225767
AN:
1461650
Hom.:
516624
Cov.:
52
AF XY:
0.841
AC XY:
611422
AN XY:
727140
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.565
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.912
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.907
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.998
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.899
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.759
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.835
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.838
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.767
AC:
116584
AN:
152020
Hom.:
46139
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.772
AC XY:
57365
AN XY:
74294
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.559
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.881
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.908
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.998
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.908
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.754
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.831
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.818
Alfa
AF:
0.811
Hom.:
33550
Bravo
AF:
0.769
Asia WGS
AF:
0.931
AC:
3238
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.851
EpiControl
AF:
0.855

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2024
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 97% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Number of patients: 90. Only high quality variants are reported. -

Jan 05, 2016
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Apr 20, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 94 Benign:2
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 22, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Jan 08, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
9.0
DANN
Benign
0.65
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11074121; hg19: chr15-93521604; API