15-93024634-A-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001271.4(CHD2):​c.5416A>C​(p.Arg1806Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.354 in 1,613,926 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 108,098 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.28 ( 7212 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.36 ( 100886 hom. )

Consequence

CHD2
NM_001271.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.978
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHD2 (HGNC:1917): (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 2) The CHD family of proteins is characterized by the presence of chromo (chromatin organization modifier) domains and SNF2-related helicase/ATPase domains. CHD genes alter gene expression possibly by modification of chromatin structure thus altering access of the transcriptional apparatus to its chromosomal DNA template. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant 15-93024634-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-93024634-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 257713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.978 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.386 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CHD2NM_001271.4 linkc.5416A>C p.Arg1806Arg synonymous_variant Exon 39 of 39 ENST00000394196.9 NP_001262.3 O14647-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHD2ENST00000394196.9 linkc.5416A>C p.Arg1806Arg synonymous_variant Exon 39 of 39 5 NM_001271.4 ENSP00000377747.4 O14647-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.282
AC:
42904
AN:
152056
Hom.:
7210
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.136
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.473
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.264
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.435
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0728
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.251
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.227
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.383
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.390
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.322
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.295
AC:
73504
AN:
249530
Hom.:
12678
AF XY:
0.305
AC XY:
41337
AN XY:
135388
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.122
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.183
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.437
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0719
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.274
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.229
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.391
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.340
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.361
AC:
527915
AN:
1461752
Hom.:
100886
Cov.:
42
AF XY:
0.360
AC XY:
261745
AN XY:
727180
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.129
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.192
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.434
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0645
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.275
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.236
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.397
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.346
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.282
AC:
42922
AN:
152174
Hom.:
7212
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.274
AC XY:
20396
AN XY:
74400
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.136
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.263
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.435
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0728
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.252
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.227
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.390
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.317
Alfa
AF:
0.352
Hom.:
8407
Bravo
AF:
0.278
Asia WGS
AF:
0.184
AC:
637
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.418
EpiControl
AF:
0.415

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Jan 07, 2016
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2024
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 46% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Number of patients: 43. Only high quality variants are reported. -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Apr 20, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 94 Benign:2
Jul 22, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Jan 08, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.65
CADD
Benign
7.9
DANN
Benign
0.68
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs12906163; hg19: chr15-93567864; COSMIC: COSV67710013; COSMIC: COSV67710013; API