15-99105481-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4BS2
The NM_145728.3(SYNM):c.282G>C(p.Glu94Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000102 in 1,368,334 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E94K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_145728.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_145728.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYNM | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.282G>C | p.Glu94Asp | missense | Exon 1 of 4 | ENSP00000336775.7 | O15061-1 | ||
| SYNM | TSL:1 | c.282G>C | p.Glu94Asp | missense | Exon 1 of 5 | ENSP00000472953.1 | O15061-2 | ||
| SYNM | TSL:1 | c.282G>C | p.Glu94Asp | missense | Exon 1 of 4 | ENSP00000330469.8 | O15061-3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000331 AC: 5AN: 151102Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000107 AC: 4AN: 37392 AF XY: 0.0000449 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000110 AC: 134AN: 1217232Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000111 AC XY: 66AN XY: 595508 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000331 AC: 5AN: 151102Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000271 AC XY: 2AN XY: 73786 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at