16-10907837-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000246.4(CIITA):āc.2345T>Cā(p.Val782Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0759 in 1,613,464 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5,099 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000246.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIITA | NM_000246.4 | c.2345T>C | p.Val782Ala | missense_variant | 11/20 | ENST00000324288.14 | NP_000237.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIITA | ENST00000324288.14 | c.2345T>C | p.Val782Ala | missense_variant | 11/20 | 1 | NM_000246.4 | ENSP00000316328.8 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0622 AC: 9464AN: 152094Hom.: 366 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0629 AC: 15563AN: 247422Hom.: 605 AF XY: 0.0650 AC XY: 8749AN XY: 134604
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0773 AC: 112944AN: 1461252Hom.: 4733 Cov.: 69 AF XY: 0.0775 AC XY: 56362AN XY: 726930
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0623 AC: 9476AN: 152212Hom.: 366 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0618 AC XY: 4603AN XY: 74426
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
MHC class II deficiency Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at