16-10907913-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000246.4(CIITA):​c.2421G>T​(p.Leu807=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.211 in 1,577,540 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 37,267 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.21 ( 3672 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.21 ( 33595 hom. )

Consequence

CIITA
NM_000246.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.737
Variant links:
Genes affected
CIITA (HGNC:7067): (class II major histocompatibility complex transactivator) This gene encodes a protein with an acidic transcriptional activation domain, 4 LRRs (leucine-rich repeats) and a GTP binding domain. The protein is located in the nucleus and acts as a positive regulator of class II major histocompatibility complex gene transcription, and is referred to as the "master control factor" for the expression of these genes. The protein also binds GTP and uses GTP binding to facilitate its own transport into the nucleus. Once in the nucleus it does not bind DNA but rather uses an intrinsic acetyltransferase (AT) activity to act in a coactivator-like fashion. Mutations in this gene have been associated with bare lymphocyte syndrome type II (also known as hereditary MHC class II deficiency or HLA class II-deficient combined immunodeficiency), increased susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and possibly myocardial infarction. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.64).
BP6
Variant 16-10907913-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-10907913-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 317712.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.737 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.309 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CIITANM_000246.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2421G>T p.Leu807= synonymous_variant 11/20 ENST00000324288.14 NP_000237.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CIITAENST00000324288.14 linkuse as main transcriptc.2421G>T p.Leu807= synonymous_variant 11/201 NM_000246.4 ENSP00000316328 P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.213
AC:
32380
AN:
152106
Hom.:
3659
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.203
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.174
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.316
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.220
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.154
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.204
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.152
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.206
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.211
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.189
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.235
AC:
50851
AN:
216436
Hom.:
7015
AF XY:
0.225
AC XY:
26301
AN XY:
116916
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.205
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.445
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.233
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.145
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.214
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.162
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.210
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.225
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.211
AC:
300723
AN:
1425316
Hom.:
33595
Cov.:
63
AF XY:
0.209
AC XY:
147769
AN XY:
705370
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.199
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.427
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.228
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.204
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.203
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.166
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.206
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.216
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.213
AC:
32425
AN:
152224
Hom.:
3672
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.213
AC XY:
15876
AN XY:
74426
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.203
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.316
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.220
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.154
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.203
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.152
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.211
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.193
Alfa
AF:
0.217
Hom.:
1019
Bravo
AF:
0.225
Asia WGS
AF:
0.235
AC:
817
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

MHC class II deficiency Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 10, 2021- -
not provided Benign:1Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect, ClinGen-Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.64
CADD
Benign
9.2
DANN
Benign
0.72

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34654419; hg19: chr16-11001770; COSMIC: COSV60854299; API