16-11548251-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_001136472.2(LITAF):c.*1386G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000397 in 453,904 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000046 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

LITAF
NM_001136472.2 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.30

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

LITAF (HGNC:16841): (lipopolysaccharide induced TNF factor) Lipopolysaccharide is a potent stimulator of monocytes and macrophages, causing secretion of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and other inflammatory mediators. This gene encodes lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-alpha factor, which is a DNA-binding protein and can mediate the TNF-alpha expression by direct binding to the promoter region of the TNF-alpha gene. The transcription of this gene is induced by tumor suppressor p53 and has been implicated in the p53-induced apoptotic pathway. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C (CMT1C) and may be involved in the carcinogenesis of extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD). Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2014]

LITAF Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen

LITAF links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000263 (4/152134) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0000588 (4/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000197. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 14 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LITAF	NM_001136472.2 link	c.*1386G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 4 of 4	ENST00000622633.5	NP_001129944.1	Q99732-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LITAF	ENST00000622633.5 link	c.*1386G>A	3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 4 of 4	1	NM_001136472.2	ENSP00000483114.1	Q99732-1
LITAF	ENST00000339430.9 link	c.*1386G>A	3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 4 of 4	1		ENSP00000340118.5	Q99732-1
LITAF	ENST00000571688.6 link	c.*1386G>A	3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 4 of 4	1		ENSP00000459533.1	Q99732-1
LITAF	ENST00000413364.6 link	c.*1511G>A	3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 5 of 5	2		ENSP00000397958.2	Q99732-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152134

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

130404

AF XY:

0.0000562

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000164

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000805

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000464

AC:

AN:

301770

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000407

AC XY:

AN XY:

171980

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000117

AC:

AN:

8550

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

27268

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10786

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

9210

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000503

AC:

AN:

59646

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

12364

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1148

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000630

AC:

AN:

158758

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

14040

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.496

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152134

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74306

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41418

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15274

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5200

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000588

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.450

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000264

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C

Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.87

CADD

Benign

0.24

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.73

PhyloP100

-2.3

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

16-11548251-C-T

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over