16-11548821-A-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1

The NM_001136472.2(LITAF):​c.*816T>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0146 in 450,504 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 302 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.032 ( 246 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0058 ( 56 hom. )

Consequence

LITAF
NM_001136472.2 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, single submitter B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.13

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
LITAF (HGNC:16841): (lipopolysaccharide induced TNF factor) Lipopolysaccharide is a potent stimulator of monocytes and macrophages, causing secretion of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and other inflammatory mediators. This gene encodes lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-alpha factor, which is a DNA-binding protein and can mediate the TNF-alpha expression by direct binding to the promoter region of the TNF-alpha gene. The transcription of this gene is induced by tumor suppressor p53 and has been implicated in the p53-induced apoptotic pathway. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C (CMT1C) and may be involved in the carcinogenesis of extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD). Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2014]
LITAF Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-1.03).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.104 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
LITAFNM_001136472.2 linkc.*816T>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 4 of 4 ENST00000622633.5 NP_001129944.1 Q99732-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LITAFENST00000622633.5 linkc.*816T>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 4 of 4 1 NM_001136472.2 ENSP00000483114.1 Q99732-1
LITAFENST00000339430.9 linkc.*816T>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 4 of 4 1 ENSP00000340118.5 Q99732-1
LITAFENST00000571688.6 linkc.*816T>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 4 of 4 1 ENSP00000459533.1 Q99732-1
LITAFENST00000413364.6 linkc.*941T>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 5 of 5 2 ENSP00000397958.2 Q99732-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0319
AC:
4820
AN:
151206
Hom.:
246
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.107
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00155
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00271
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00423
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00190
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0213
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00816
AC:
1042
AN:
127772
AF XY:
0.00708
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.107
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00588
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000629
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000590
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00656
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00282
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00586
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00579
AC:
1733
AN:
299184
Hom.:
56
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00494
AC XY:
843
AN XY:
170820
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.107
AC:
881
AN:
8236
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00609
AC:
161
AN:
26448
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000187
AC:
2
AN:
10674
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000652
AC:
6
AN:
9204
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00218
AC:
129
AN:
59156
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00527
AC:
65
AN:
12332
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0106
AC:
12
AN:
1136
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00206
AC:
326
AN:
158104
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0109
AC:
151
AN:
13894
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.444
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
89
178
268
357
446
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0319
AC:
4824
AN:
151320
Hom.:
246
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0317
AC XY:
2343
AN XY:
73978
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.107
AC:
4403
AN:
41230
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0117
AC:
178
AN:
15218
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3464
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00155
AC:
8
AN:
5156
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00272
AC:
13
AN:
4784
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00423
AC:
44
AN:
10408
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0136
AC:
4
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00190
AC:
129
AN:
67766
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0215
AC:
45
AN:
2090
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.461
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
184
367
551
734
918
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
46
92
138
184
230
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0150
Hom.:
21
Bravo
AF:
0.0364

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-1.0
CADD
Benign
0.25
DANN
Benign
0.15
PhyloP100
-1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7187810; hg19: chr16-11642677; COSMIC: COSV59655574; COSMIC: COSV59655574; API