16-11556552-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6_ModerateBS1BS2

The NM_001136472.2(LITAF):c.179C>T(p.Ser60Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000112 in 1,614,064 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000010 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

LITAF
NM_001136472.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, single submitter B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.388

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

LITAF (HGNC:16841): (lipopolysaccharide induced TNF factor) Lipopolysaccharide is a potent stimulator of monocytes and macrophages, causing secretion of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and other inflammatory mediators. This gene encodes lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-alpha factor, which is a DNA-binding protein and can mediate the TNF-alpha expression by direct binding to the promoter region of the TNF-alpha gene. The transcription of this gene is induced by tumor suppressor p53 and has been implicated in the p53-induced apoptotic pathway. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C (CMT1C) and may be involved in the carcinogenesis of extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD). Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2014]

LITAF Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen

LITAF links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.1418407).

BP6

Variant 16-11556552-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-11556552-G-A is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 578023.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000197 (3/152182) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0000441 (3/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000117. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 0 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 15 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LITAF	NM_001136472.2 link	c.179C>T	p.Ser60Leu	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 4	ENST00000622633.5	NP_001129944.1	Q99732-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
LITAF	ENST00000622633.5 link	c.179C>T	p.Ser60Leu	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 4	1	NM_001136472.2	ENSP00000483114.1		Q99732-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152182

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000199

AC:

AN:

250728

AF XY:

0.00000738

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000868

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000103

AC:

AN:

1461882

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000124

AC XY:

AN XY:

727238

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000232

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53418

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000540

AC:

AN:

1112008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.478

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152182

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74350

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41448

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15262

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5198

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10628

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000113

ExAC

AF:

0.0000247

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C

Benign:1

Jan 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.086

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.094

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.19

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.86

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.26

T;T;.;T;.;T;T;T;T;T;.;.;.;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-1.0

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.1

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.19

LIST_S2

Benign

0.67

.;T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;T;T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.022

MetaRNN

Benign

0.14

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.81

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.41

N;N;N;N;N;N;.;N;N;.;.;N;.;.;.

PhyloP100

0.39

PrimateAI

Benign

0.30

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.0

.;.;N;N;N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.46

Sift

Benign

0.40

.;.;T;T;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.26

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;.;.;T;.;T;D

Polyphen

0.0010

B;B;.;B;B;B;.;B;B;.;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.16

MutPred

0.17

Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);Loss of glycosylation at S60 (P = 0.0096);

MVP

0.85

MPC

0.13

ClinPred

0.016

GERP RS

0.019

Varity_R

0.024

gMVP

0.55

Mutation Taster

=90/10

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.060

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over