16-13935495-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_005236.3(ERCC4):āc.1563C>Gā(p.Ser521Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00124 in 1,614,058 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005236.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC4 | NM_005236.3 | c.1563C>G | p.Ser521Arg | missense_variant | 8/11 | ENST00000311895.8 | NP_005227.1 | |
ERCC4 | XM_011522424.4 | c.1701C>G | p.Ser567Arg | missense_variant | 9/12 | XP_011520726.1 | ||
ERCC4 | XM_047433774.1 | c.774C>G | p.Ser258Arg | missense_variant | 5/8 | XP_047289730.1 | ||
ERCC4 | XM_011522427.2 | c.213C>G | p.Ser71Arg | missense_variant | 3/6 | XP_011520729.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC4 | ENST00000311895.8 | c.1563C>G | p.Ser521Arg | missense_variant | 8/11 | 1 | NM_005236.3 | ENSP00000310520.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00101 AC: 154AN: 152096Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000880 AC: 221AN: 251214Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000876 AC XY: 119AN XY: 135866
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00127 AC: 1852AN: 1461844Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00121 AC XY: 883AN XY: 727226
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00101 AC: 154AN: 152214Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00102 AC XY: 76AN XY: 74420
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Oct 29, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | ENSG00000262732: BS2; ERCC4: BP4, BS2 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The ERCC4 p.Ser521Arg variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs41552412) as "With Uncertain significance allele", LOVD 3.0, and in ClinVar (classified as a VUS by Illumina, Invitae, Fulgent Genetics and ITMI; associated conditions of Xeroderma pigmnetosum, XFE progeroid syndrome, Cockayne syndrome, and Fanconi anemia complementation group Q).The variant was also identified in control databases in 240 of 282606 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.000849 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 81 of 35434 chromosomes (freq: 0.002286), Other in 13 of 7214 chromosomes (freq: 0.001802), European (non-Finnish) in 140 of 129056 chromosomes (freq: 0.001085) and African in 6 of 24864 chromosomes (freq: 0.000241), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish) and South Asian populations. Bodian et al. sequenced whole genomes from 681 healthy individuals; the p.S521R variant was identified at an allele frequency of 0.0015 in the European population, and was not found in any other population frequency within the cohort (Bodian_2014_PMID: 24728327). The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 2 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder-like & MaxEntScan) predict the gain of a 5' splice site at c.1562 and c.1558, respectively. The p.Ser521 residue is conserved in mammals but not distantly related organisms, and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Dec 15, 2020 | DNA sequence analysis of the ERCC4 gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.1563C>G, in exon 8 that results in an amino acid change, p.Ser521Arg. This sequence change does not appear to have been previously described in patients with ERCC4-related disorders and has been described in the gnomAD database with a relatively high population frequency of 0.11% in non-Finnish European subpopulations (dbSNP rs41552412). The p.Ser521Arg change affects a moderately conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the ERCC4 protein that is known to be functional. In-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL) provide contradictory results for the p.Ser521Arg substitution. Due to these contrasting evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Ser521Arg change remains unknown at this time. - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group Q Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Apr 13, 2019 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F;C1970416:XFE progeroid syndrome;C3808988:Fanconi anemia complementation group Q Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
Cockayne syndrome;C0268140:Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F;C3808988:Fanconi anemia complementation group Q Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 28, 2023 | - - |
Xeroderma pigmentosum Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 06, 2022 | - - |
ERCC4-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 20, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at