16-15715019-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_002474.3(MYH11):​c.5676G>C​(p.Glu1892Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00563 in 1,613,984 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0050 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0057 ( 35 hom. )

Consequence

MYH11
NM_002474.3 missense

Scores

1
12
5

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.62
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH11 (HGNC:7569): (myosin heavy chain 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a smooth muscle myosin belonging to the myosin heavy chain family. The gene product is a subunit of a hexameric protein that consists of two heavy chain subunits and two pairs of non-identical light chain subunits. It functions as a major contractile protein, converting chemical energy into mechanical energy through the hydrolysis of ATP. A chromosomal rearrangement involving this gene is associated with acute myeloid leukemia of the M4Eo subtype. Mutations in this gene are associated with visceral myopathy, megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome 2, and familial thoracic aortic aneurysm 4. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
NDE1 (HGNC:17619): (nudE neurodevelopment protein 1) This gene encodes a member of the nuclear distribution E (NudE) family of proteins. The encoded protein is localized at the centrosome and interacts with other centrosome components as part of a multiprotein complex that regulates dynein function. This protein plays an essential role in microtubule organization, mitosis and neuronal migration. Mutations in this gene cause lissencephaly 4, a disorder characterized by lissencephaly, severe brain atrophy, microcephaly, and severe cognitive disability. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013423175).
BP6
Variant 16-15715019-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-15715019-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 138358.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-15715019-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr16-15715019-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.005 (761/152312) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00791 (121/15306). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00676. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 362 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH11NM_002474.3 linkc.5676G>C p.Glu1892Asp missense_variant Exon 40 of 41 ENST00000300036.6 NP_002465.1 P35749-1A0A024QZJ4
MYH11NM_001040113.2 linkc.5697G>C p.Glu1899Asp missense_variant Exon 41 of 43 ENST00000452625.7 NP_001035202.1 P35749-3
NDE1NM_017668.3 linkc.948-9172C>G intron_variant Intron 8 of 8 ENST00000396354.6 NP_060138.1 Q9NXR1-2X5DR54

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH11ENST00000300036.6 linkc.5676G>C p.Glu1892Asp missense_variant Exon 40 of 41 1 NM_002474.3 ENSP00000300036.5 P35749-1
MYH11ENST00000452625.7 linkc.5697G>C p.Glu1899Asp missense_variant Exon 41 of 43 1 NM_001040113.2 ENSP00000407821.2 P35749-3
NDE1ENST00000396354.6 linkc.948-9172C>G intron_variant Intron 8 of 8 1 NM_017668.3 ENSP00000379642.1 Q9NXR1-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00500
AC:
761
AN:
152194
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00244
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00792
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00605
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00612
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00610
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00907
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00507
AC:
1273
AN:
251278
Hom.:
6
AF XY:
0.00536
AC XY:
728
AN XY:
135836
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00659
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00546
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00242
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00576
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00612
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0108
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00569
AC:
8321
AN:
1461672
Hom.:
35
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00570
AC XY:
4148
AN XY:
727158
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00689
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00539
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00268
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00594
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00607
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00677
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00500
AC:
761
AN:
152312
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00486
AC XY:
362
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00243
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00791
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00605
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00612
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00610
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00898
Alfa
AF:
0.00604
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00533
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00431
AC:
16
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00778
AC:
30
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00159
AC:
7
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00709
AC:
61
ExAC
AF:
0.00513
AC:
623
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00714
EpiControl
AF:
0.00753

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 4 Benign:6
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

May 31, 2017
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 28, 2017
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2020
Biochemical Molecular Genetic Laboratory, King Abdulaziz Medical City
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:4
Dec 11, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Glu1899Asp in exon 41 of MYH11: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.5% (623/121214) of pan ethnic c hromosomes including 3 homozygous individuals by the Exome Aggregation Consortiu m (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org/; dbSNP rs113964173). -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 23, 2013
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Oct 29, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

MYH11: BS2; NDE1: BS2 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:2
Mar 16, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 06, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.26
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.23
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.10
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.70
.;.;.;D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.38
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.27
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.92
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.95
D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.013
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.037
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.2
.;.;M;M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.71
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.6
D;D;.;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.56
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.035
D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.88
.;.;.;P
Vest4
0.66
MutPred
0.39
.;.;Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.092);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.092);
MVP
0.84
MPC
0.68
ClinPred
0.038
T
GERP RS
1.1
Varity_R
0.68
gMVP
0.33

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs113964173; hg19: chr16-15808876; COSMIC: COSV100260597; COSMIC: COSV100260597; API