16-16009796-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PP3_ModerateBS2
The NM_004996.4(ABCC1):c.246G>T(p.Trp82Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000479 in 1,607,336 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004996.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- hearing loss, autosomal dominant 77Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004996.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABCC1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.246G>T | p.Trp82Cys | missense | Exon 3 of 31 | ENSP00000382342.3 | P33527-1 | ||
| ABCC1 | TSL:1 | c.246G>T | p.Trp82Cys | missense | Exon 3 of 30 | ENSP00000461615.2 | P33527-2 | ||
| ABCC1 | TSL:1 | n.321G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 12 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152008Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000829 AC: 2AN: 241218 AF XY: 0.0000152 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000447 AC: 65AN: 1455328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000428 AC XY: 31AN XY: 723912 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152008Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74236 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at