16-177088-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 8P and 2B. PM1PM2PP3_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_000558.5(HBA1):c.255C>A(p.Ser85Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000129 in 1,546,446 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Uncertain significancein ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000558.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBA1 | NM_000558.5 | c.255C>A | p.Ser85Arg | missense_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000320868.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBA1 | ENST00000320868.9 | c.255C>A | p.Ser85Arg | missense_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_000558.5 | P1 | |
HBA1 | ENST00000472694.1 | n.391C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/2 | 1 | ||||
HBA1 | ENST00000487791.1 | n.224C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 | 1 | ||||
HBA1 | ENST00000397797.1 | c.159C>A | p.Ser53Arg | missense_variant | 2/3 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000663 AC: 1AN: 150750Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 7.16e-7 AC: 1AN: 1395696Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.00000144 AC XY: 1AN XY: 692090
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000663 AC: 1AN: 150750Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 73486
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 23, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at