16-177111-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5
The ENST00000320868.9(HBA1):c.278G>T(p.Arg93Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000143 in 1,402,746 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic,other (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R93Q) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000320868.9 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBA1 | NM_000558.5 | c.278G>T | p.Arg93Leu | missense_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000320868.9 | NP_000549.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBA1 | ENST00000320868.9 | c.278G>T | p.Arg93Leu | missense_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_000558.5 | ENSP00000322421 | P1 | |
HBA1 | ENST00000472694.1 | n.414G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/2 | 1 | |||||
HBA1 | ENST00000487791.1 | n.247G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 | 1 | |||||
HBA1 | ENST00000397797.1 | c.182G>T | p.Arg61Leu | missense_variant | 2/3 | 2 | ENSP00000380899 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000143 AC: 2AN: 1402746Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.00000144 AC XY: 1AN XY: 696028
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Erythrocytosis, familial, 7 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Jan 01, 1983 | - - |
HEMOGLOBIN CHESAPEAKE Other:1
other, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Nov 01, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at