16-2053371-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):​c.255C>T​(p.Val85=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00124 in 1,590,176 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00081 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.30
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).
BP6
Variant 16-2053371-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2053371-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 49572.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-2053371-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr16-2053371-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.3 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 123 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
TSC2NM_000548.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.255C>T p.Val85= synonymous_variant 4/42 ENST00000219476.9 NP_000539.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TSC2ENST00000219476.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.255C>T p.Val85= synonymous_variant 4/425 NM_000548.5 ENSP00000219476 P49815-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000808
AC:
123
AN:
152222
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000314
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000851
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00118
AC:
248
AN:
209850
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00110
AC XY:
125
AN XY:
113228
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000634
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000980
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00159
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00177
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00129
AC:
1853
AN:
1437836
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00124
AC XY:
886
AN XY:
713026
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000363
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000988
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000353
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00112
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00146
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00168
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000807
AC:
123
AN:
152340
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000765
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000849
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000941
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.00137
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000865
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 21, 2013Val85Val in exon 4 of TSC2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.2% (16/8582) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs45517098). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 01, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 12, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoAug 14, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 08, 2018Variant summary: TSC2 c.255C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0011 in 235020 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The observed variant frequency is approximately 16-folds higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TSC2 causing Tuberous Sclerosis Complex phenotype (6.9e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.255C>T in individuals affected with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Four ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant as likely benign/benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabNov 07, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMay 30, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthSep 16, 2022- -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2024TSC2: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:2Other:1
not provided, no classification providedcurationTuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 07, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Oct 30, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.75
CADD
Benign
0.29
DANN
Benign
0.55
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45517098; hg19: chr16-2103372; API