16-2053391-A-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):​c.275A>T​(p.Glu92Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00126 in 1,592,736 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E92Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00093 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 missense

Scores

3
12
3

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.04

Publications

23 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
TSC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • tuberous sclerosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • tuberous sclerosis 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
  • lymphangioleiomyomatosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • tuberous sclerosis complex
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.04099989).
BP6
Variant 16-2053391-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2053391-A-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 50116.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000926 (141/152302) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00172 (117/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00147. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 69 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 141 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000548.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TSC2
NM_000548.5
MANE Select
c.275A>Tp.Glu92Val
missense
Exon 4 of 42NP_000539.2
TSC2
NM_001406663.1
c.275A>Tp.Glu92Val
missense
Exon 4 of 42NP_001393592.1
TSC2
NM_001114382.3
c.275A>Tp.Glu92Val
missense
Exon 4 of 41NP_001107854.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TSC2
ENST00000219476.9
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.275A>Tp.Glu92Val
missense
Exon 4 of 42ENSP00000219476.3
TSC2
ENST00000350773.9
TSL:1
c.275A>Tp.Glu92Val
missense
Exon 4 of 41ENSP00000344383.4
TSC2
ENST00000401874.7
TSL:1
c.275A>Tp.Glu92Val
missense
Exon 4 of 40ENSP00000384468.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000927
AC:
141
AN:
152184
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000848
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00172
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00100
AC:
214
AN:
213250
AF XY:
0.00112
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000782
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000612
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00112
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00164
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000932
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00129
AC:
1862
AN:
1440434
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00129
AC XY:
921
AN XY:
714558
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000151
AC:
5
AN:
33138
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000860
AC:
36
AN:
41860
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000428
AC:
11
AN:
25676
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
38680
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000339
AC:
28
AN:
82642
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00149
AC:
76
AN:
50846
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000187
AC:
1
AN:
5356
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00148
AC:
1637
AN:
1102730
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00114
AC:
68
AN:
59506
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
116
233
349
466
582
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
56
112
168
224
280
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000926
AC:
141
AN:
152302
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000926
AC XY:
69
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000120
AC:
5
AN:
41566
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000523
AC:
8
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000288
AC:
1
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5164
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000848
AC:
9
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00172
AC:
117
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
7
15
22
30
37
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00127
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000763
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00130
AC:
5
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00221
AC:
19
ExAC
AF:
0.000833
AC:
100

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:6
Jan 26, 2023
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 07, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 02, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. Homozygosity has been confirmed in one or more individuals. As homozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality, this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic.

not provided Benign:5
Mar 19, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21407264, 23514105, 22558107, 21624971, 24728327, 28873162, 29801666)

Mar 14, 2019
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TSC2: BP4, BS1, BS2

Nov 07, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

not specified Benign:4Other:1
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 27, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: TSC2 c.275A>T (p.Glu92Val) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the N-terminal domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.001 in 213250 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The observed variant frequency is approximately 14.6- fold the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TSC2 causing Tuberous Sclerosis Complex phenotype (6.9e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.275A>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (examples-Dunlop_2011, Bullich_2018) and in at least one unaffected family member (Dunlop_2011). These data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. These results showed no damaging effect of this variant (Dunlop_2011). Seven ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) classified the variant as benign (n=2)/likely benign (n=5). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

Jul 01, 2020
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The c.275A>T variant in TSC2 has been reported in individuals with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (Dunlop 2011 PMID: 21407264, Bullich 2018 PMID: 29801666); however, it has also been identified in 0.17% (189/109664) of Finnish chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has also been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID 50116). Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. This variant is classified as Likely Benign due to its frequency in the general population. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS1, BP4.

Dec 27, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:2Other:1
Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:curation

Aug 10, 2022
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Dec 18, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Sep 21, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Lymphangiomyomatosis;C1846385:Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II;C1860707:Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:1
Apr 09, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.27
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.21
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.080
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.83
D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.35
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.35
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
1.0
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.95
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.36
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.041
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.10
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.1
M
PhyloP100
9.0
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-4.0
D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.56
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0030
D
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.63
MVP
0.76
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
4.8
PromoterAI
-0.016
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.41
gMVP
0.58
Mutation Taster
=0/100
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs137853994; hg19: chr16-2103392; COSMIC: COSV104587080; API