16-2058759-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):​c.861G>C​(p.Glu287Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000024 in 1,584,232 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E287K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000022 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 missense

Scores

6
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.211
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 4 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 5 benign, 16 uncertain in NM_000548.5
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.06596318).
BP6
Variant 16-2058759-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2058759-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 238095.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr16-2058759-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 6 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TSC2NM_000548.5 linkc.861G>C p.Glu287Asp missense_variant Exon 10 of 42 ENST00000219476.9 NP_000539.2 P49815-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TSC2ENST00000219476.9 linkc.861G>C p.Glu287Asp missense_variant Exon 10 of 42 5 NM_000548.5 ENSP00000219476.3 P49815-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152266
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000544
AC:
11
AN:
202146
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000555
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
108188
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000383
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000223
AC:
32
AN:
1431848
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000169
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
709198
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000353
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000146
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000169
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152384
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000268
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74518
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000868
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000907
ExAC
AF:
0.0000249
AC:
3

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jan 11, 2018
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 30, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 07, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Lymphangiomyomatosis;C1846385:Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II;C1860707:Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:2
Jan 05, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in the Genome Aggregation Database (Highest reported MAF 0.03% (5/15288) (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/16-2058759-G-C?dataset=gnomad_r3). This variant is present in ClinVar, with several labs classifying this variant as Likely Benign or Benign (Variation ID:238095). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools suggest that this variant may not impact the protein. In summary, data on this variant suggests that this variant does not cause disease but requires further evidence. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Nov 04, 2021
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 06, 2022
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

TSC2-related disorder Benign:1
Dec 02, 2021
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.11
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.090
CADD
Benign
2.7
DANN
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.49
T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.4
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.48
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.77
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.13
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.066
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.16
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L;.;.;.;L;L;.;.;.;L;.;L;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.59
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N;.;.;N;.;N;.;.;N;N;.;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.31
Sift
Uncertain
0.016
D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.092
T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;.;T
Polyphen
0.70
P;.;.;.;P;B;.;.;D;P;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.56
MutPred
0.37
Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);.;Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);.;Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);.;
MVP
0.82
ClinPred
0.18
T
GERP RS
-10
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.27
gMVP
0.26

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs192567788; hg19: chr16-2108760; API