16-2071868-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):​c.2031C>T​(p.Pro677Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00588 in 1,593,286 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 37 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P677P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0034 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0061 ( 36 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:25O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.64

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
TSC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • tuberous sclerosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • tuberous sclerosis 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
  • lymphangioleiomyomatosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • tuberous sclerosis complex
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 16-2071868-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2071868-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 49616.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.63 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00341 (519/152344) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00637 (433/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00587. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 235 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 519 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TSC2NM_000548.5 linkc.2031C>T p.Pro677Pro synonymous_variant Exon 19 of 42 ENST00000219476.9 NP_000539.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TSC2ENST00000219476.9 linkc.2031C>T p.Pro677Pro synonymous_variant Exon 19 of 42 5 NM_000548.5 ENSP00000219476.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00341
AC:
519
AN:
152226
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000659
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00636
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00255
AC:
534
AN:
209016
AF XY:
0.00254
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000187
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000550
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00494
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00171
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00615
AC:
8856
AN:
1440942
Hom.:
36
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00585
AC XY:
4184
AN XY:
715160
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00100
AC:
33
AN:
32996
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00181
AC:
77
AN:
42490
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25704
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000259
AC:
1
AN:
38554
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000108
AC:
9
AN:
83228
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000637
AC:
32
AN:
50226
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000176
AC:
1
AN:
5686
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00769
AC:
8477
AN:
1102574
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00380
AC:
226
AN:
59484
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
558
1117
1675
2234
2792
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
354
708
1062
1416
1770
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00341
AC:
519
AN:
152344
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00315
AC XY:
235
AN XY:
74500
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00123
AC:
51
AN:
41582
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00144
AC:
22
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000659
AC:
7
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00637
AC:
433
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00284
AC:
6
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.521
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
29
58
88
117
146
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00415
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00317

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:25Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:11
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 17, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 13, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jun 21, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 19, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 20, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Pro677Pro in exon 19 of TSC2: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.5% (136/24126) o f European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.br oadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs45517208). -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:5
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 26, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TSC2: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 23, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.2031C>T (p.Pro677=) in TSC2 gene is a synonymous change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at frequency of 0.003 (156/47170 chrs tested), predominantly in individuals of European descent (0.006; 136/24126). This frequency exceeds the estimated maximum allele frequency for a pathogenic allele in this gene (0.0000068). The variant of interest has been cited as Benign/Likely Benign by multiple reputable databases/clinical laboratories. Taking together, based on the prevalence of this variant in general population the variant was classified as Benign. -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:3Other:1
-
Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:curation

- -

May 01, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Aug 17, 2022
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:3
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 07, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 16, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
May 10, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Oct 14, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome;C0349649:Lung lymphangioleiomyomatosis Benign:1
Oct 27, 2022
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
0.40
DANN
Benign
0.60
PhyloP100
-1.6
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45517208; hg19: chr16-2121869; COSMIC: COSV104587081; API