16-2071910-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):​c.2073C>T​(p.Arg691Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000453 in 1,592,702 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R691R) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00047 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00045 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -8.34

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
TSC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • tuberous sclerosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • tuberous sclerosis 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
  • lymphangioleiomyomatosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • tuberous sclerosis complex
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).
BP6
Variant 16-2071910-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2071910-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 49716.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-8.34 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000451 (650/1440330) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00142 (118/83300). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00121. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 340 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 71 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000548.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TSC2
NM_000548.5
MANE Select
c.2073C>Tp.Arg691Arg
synonymous
Exon 19 of 42NP_000539.2
TSC2
NM_001406663.1
c.2073C>Tp.Arg691Arg
synonymous
Exon 19 of 42NP_001393592.1
TSC2
NM_001114382.3
c.2073C>Tp.Arg691Arg
synonymous
Exon 19 of 41NP_001107854.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TSC2
ENST00000219476.9
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.2073C>Tp.Arg691Arg
synonymous
Exon 19 of 42ENSP00000219476.3
TSC2
ENST00000350773.9
TSL:1
c.2073C>Tp.Arg691Arg
synonymous
Exon 19 of 41ENSP00000344383.4
TSC2
ENST00000401874.7
TSL:1
c.2073C>Tp.Arg691Arg
synonymous
Exon 19 of 40ENSP00000384468.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000473
AC:
72
AN:
152254
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000827
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000220
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000933
AC:
195
AN:
208904
AF XY:
0.000998
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000160
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000639
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0102
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000375
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000491
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00192
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000451
AC:
650
AN:
1440330
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000476
AC XY:
340
AN XY:
714542
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000121
AC:
4
AN:
33088
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000944
AC:
4
AN:
42380
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0105
AC:
268
AN:
25638
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000181
AC:
7
AN:
38714
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
118
AN:
83300
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000992
AC:
5
AN:
50388
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00107
AC:
6
AN:
5614
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000160
AC:
176
AN:
1101790
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00104
AC:
62
AN:
59418
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
41
81
122
162
203
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000466
AC:
71
AN:
152372
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000564
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
74520
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000120
AC:
5
AN:
41594
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000261
AC:
4
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0110
AC:
38
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000578
AC:
3
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000828
AC:
4
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000941
AC:
1
AN:
10632
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000220
AC:
15
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
9
13
18
22
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00112
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000567
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
May 27, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 16, 2025
Laboratory of Genetics, Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:4
May 16, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing.

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 07, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:3Other:1
Sep 23, 2022
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 05, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:curation

not provided Benign:2
Aug 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TSC2: BP4, BP7

Oct 06, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Nov 24, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Oct 23, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Lymphangiomyomatosis;C1846385:Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II;C1860707:Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:1
Dec 18, 2024
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.72
CADD
Benign
0.14
DANN
Benign
0.90
PhyloP100
-8.3
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45512398; hg19: chr16-2121911; API