16-2077723-G-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4BP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.2963G>C(p.Arg988Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000285 in 1,612,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R988H) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000027 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.97

Publications

9 publications found

Variant links:

COSMIC-nc: COSV105872539

Genes affected

TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

tuberous sclerosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
tuberous sclerosis 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
tuberous sclerosis complex
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

TSC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.2782753).

BP6

Variant 16-2077723-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2077723-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 64997.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 6 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000548.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
TSC2	NM_000548.5	MANE Select	c.2963G>C	p.Arg988Pro	missense	Exon 26 of 42	NP_000539.2
TSC2	NM_001406663.1		c.2963G>C	p.Arg988Pro	missense	Exon 26 of 42	NP_001393592.1
TSC2	NM_001114382.3		c.2963G>C	p.Arg988Pro	missense	Exon 26 of 41	NP_001107854.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
TSC2	ENST00000219476.9	TSL:5 MANE Select	c.2963G>C	p.Arg988Pro	missense	Exon 26 of 42	ENSP00000219476.3
TSC2	ENST00000350773.9	TSL:1	c.2963G>C	p.Arg988Pro	missense	Exon 26 of 41	ENSP00000344383.4
TSC2	ENST00000401874.7	TSL:1	c.2837+1138G>C		intron	N/A	ENSP00000384468.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152218

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00219

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000680

AC:

AN:

250026

AF XY:

0.0000885

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000142

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000274

AC:

AN:

1460184

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000399

AC XY:

AN XY:

726426

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86242

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

51976

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5600

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000324

AC:

AN:

1111974

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000331

AC:

AN:

60362

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.508

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152218

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000403

AC XY:

AN XY:

74362

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41466

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000654

AC:

AN:

15286

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.525

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000491

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000741

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:10Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 2

Benign:3

Jan 14, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 07, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

May 27, 2025

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance.

not provided

Benign:2

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 24, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21309039, 15798777, 26703369)

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 02, 2022

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

Feb 01, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome

Benign:1Other:1

Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)

Significance:not provided

Review Status:no classification provided

Collection Method:curation

Aug 10, 2022

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified

Benign:1

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Lymphangiomyomatosis;C1846385:Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II;C1860707:Tuberous sclerosis 2

Benign:1

Apr 17, 2022

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.23

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.088

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.14

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.76

Eigen

Uncertain

0.22

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.21

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.89

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.31

MetaRNN

Benign

0.28

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.37

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.5

PhyloP100

5.0

PrimateAI

Benign

0.48

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.7

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.65

Sift

Uncertain

0.0070

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.012

Polyphen

0.92

Vest4

0.83

MutPred

0.25

Loss of MoRF binding (P = 6e-04)

MVP

0.95

ClinPred

0.29

GERP RS

3.0

Varity_R

0.45

gMVP

0.66

Mutation Taster

=75/25

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.040

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over