16-2079419-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 2P and 14B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):​c.3275C>T​(p.Pro1092Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000049 in 1,612,650 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P1092R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000049 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 missense

Scores

5
13

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.09

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
TSC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • tuberous sclerosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • tuberous sclerosis 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
  • lymphangioleiomyomatosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • tuberous sclerosis complex
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 14 benign, 40 uncertain in NM_000548.5
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.10844454).
BP6
Variant 16-2079419-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2079419-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 141472.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 7 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TSC2NM_000548.5 linkc.3275C>T p.Pro1092Leu missense_variant Exon 28 of 42 ENST00000219476.9 NP_000539.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TSC2ENST00000219476.9 linkc.3275C>T p.Pro1092Leu missense_variant Exon 28 of 42 5 NM_000548.5 ENSP00000219476.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000460
AC:
7
AN:
152198
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000682
AC:
17
AN:
249296
AF XY:
0.0000960
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000626
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000107
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000329
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000493
AC:
72
AN:
1460452
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000578
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
726516
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000896
AC:
3
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000812
AC:
7
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000192
AC:
1
AN:
52016
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000522
AC:
58
AN:
1111996
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000497
AC:
3
AN:
60378
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5
11
16
22
27
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000460
AC:
7
AN:
152198
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000538
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000241
AC:
1
AN:
41466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000654
AC:
1
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000588
AC:
4
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2088
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.489
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000991
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000756
ExAC
AF:
0.0000825
AC:
10
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:3
May 28, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance.

Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 07, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:2
Jul 21, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The frequency of this variant in the general population (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Computational tools predict this amino acid change may be benign.

Jan 31, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Mar 20, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.068
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.049
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.090
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.72
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.54
D;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.77
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.75
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.29
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.92
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.13
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.11
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.65
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.34
N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;N;.;.;.;.;.
PhyloP100
4.1
PrimateAI
Benign
0.41
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.3
N;.;.;D;.;N;.;.;D;N;.;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.44
Sift
Uncertain
0.018
D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.27
T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;.;T
Vest4
0.42
ClinPred
0.043
T
GERP RS
3.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.047
gMVP
0.24
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587781774; hg19: chr16-2129420; API