16-2079420-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):​c.3276G>A​(p.Pro1092=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000109 in 1,591,526 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1092P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0490
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
Variant 16-2079420-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2079420-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 238016.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.049 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 10 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
TSC2NM_000548.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.3276G>A p.Pro1092= synonymous_variant 28/42 ENST00000219476.9 NP_000539.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TSC2ENST00000219476.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.3276G>A p.Pro1092= synonymous_variant 28/425 NM_000548.5 ENSP00000219476 P49815-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000661
AC:
10
AN:
151214
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000727
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000441
AC:
11
AN:
249238
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000517
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
135406
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000125
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000713
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000114
AC:
164
AN:
1440312
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000116
AC XY:
83
AN XY:
717152
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000144
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000851
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000661
AC:
10
AN:
151214
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000812
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
73856
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000727
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000777
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000718
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabNov 07, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
TSC2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 17, 2024This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 10, 2019This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27149842) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 21, 2015This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.92
CADD
Benign
0.17
DANN
Benign
0.52
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs368923127; hg19: chr16-2129421; COSMIC: COSV54759720; COSMIC: COSV54759720; API