16-2079565-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.3293C>T(p.Pro1098Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000161 in 1,610,498 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P1098LGASSSL) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | NM_000548.5 | c.3293C>T | p.Pro1098Leu | missense_variant | 29/42 | ENST00000219476.9 | NP_000539.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | ENST00000219476.9 | c.3293C>T | p.Pro1098Leu | missense_variant | 29/42 | 5 | NM_000548.5 | ENSP00000219476.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000289 AC: 7AN: 242466Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000227 AC XY: 3AN XY: 131918
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000158 AC: 23AN: 1458312Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000193 AC XY: 14AN XY: 725262
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74340
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | May 30, 2019 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 21, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28250423) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 13, 2016 | In the published literature, this variant has been reported in a family affected with autism spectrum disorder (PMID: 28250423 (2017)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00041 (4/9846 chromosomes in Ashkenazi Jewish subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 30, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Sep 11, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at