16-2084327-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4BP6BS1BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.4105C>T(p.Arg1369Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000402 in 1,612,600 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1369Q) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- tuberous sclerosisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- tuberous sclerosis 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
- lymphangioleiomyomatosisInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- tuberous sclerosis complexInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000548.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSC2 | NM_000548.5 | MANE Select | c.4105C>T | p.Arg1369Trp | missense | Exon 34 of 42 | NP_000539.2 | ||
| TSC2 | NM_001406663.1 | c.4102C>T | p.Arg1368Trp | missense | Exon 34 of 42 | NP_001393592.1 | |||
| TSC2 | NM_001114382.3 | c.4036C>T | p.Arg1346Trp | missense | Exon 33 of 41 | NP_001107854.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSC2 | ENST00000219476.9 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.4105C>T | p.Arg1369Trp | missense | Exon 34 of 42 | ENSP00000219476.3 | ||
| TSC2 | ENST00000350773.9 | TSL:1 | c.4036C>T | p.Arg1346Trp | missense | Exon 33 of 41 | ENSP00000344383.4 | ||
| TSC2 | ENST00000401874.7 | TSL:1 | c.3904C>T | p.Arg1302Trp | missense | Exon 32 of 40 | ENSP00000384468.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000243 AC: 37AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000237 AC: 59AN: 248644 AF XY: 0.000229 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000418 AC: 611AN: 1460378Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000406 AC XY: 295AN XY: 726466 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000243 AC: 37AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000229 AC XY: 17AN XY: 74362 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:6
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27601542, 26703369, 23514105, 25925381, 21309039)
TSC2: BS2
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:3
This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance.
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:2Other:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.
not specified Benign:2
Variant summary: TSC2 c.4105C>T (p.Arg1369Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00024 in 248644 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The observed variant frequency is approximately 3.45 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TSC2 causing Tuberous Sclerosis Complex phenotype (6.9e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.4105C>T in individuals affected with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex has been reported. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (Hoogeveen-Westerveld_2011). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant. The following publication has been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 21309039). Ten submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, and classified it as benign (n=4), likely benign (n=5), or uncertain significance (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
TSC2-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at