16-2086743-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 6P and 4B. PM1PM2PM5BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):āc.4861A>Gā(p.Ile1621Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000343 in 1,458,308 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I1621F) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | NM_000548.5 | c.4861A>G | p.Ile1621Val | missense_variant | 38/42 | ENST00000219476.9 | NP_000539.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | ENST00000219476.9 | c.4861A>G | p.Ile1621Val | missense_variant | 38/42 | 5 | NM_000548.5 | ENSP00000219476.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000343 AC: 5AN: 1458308Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000414 AC XY: 3AN XY: 725458
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 28, 2023 | In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt TSC2 protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 825240). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with TSC2-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 1621 of the TSC2 protein (p.Ile1621Val). - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 09, 2019 | In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; No data available from control populations to assess the frequency of this variant - |
Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Sep 13, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 03, 2022 | The p.I1621V variant (also known as c.4861A>G), located in coding exon 37 of the TSC2 gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 4861. The isoleucine at codon 1621 is replaced by valine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at