16-2088095-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 2P and 11B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):​c.5116C>T​(p.Arg1706Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000398 in 1,612,878 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1706L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00029 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00041 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 missense

Scores

5
7
7

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:11O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.10

Publications

15 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
TSC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • tuberous sclerosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • tuberous sclerosis 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
  • lymphangioleiomyomatosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • tuberous sclerosis complex
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 6 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 12 benign, 30 uncertain in NM_000548.5
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.16267908).
BP6
Variant 16-2088095-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2088095-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 49912.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000289 (44/152302) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.000481 (20/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000319. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 24 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 44 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TSC2NM_000548.5 linkc.5116C>T p.Arg1706Cys missense_variant Exon 40 of 42 ENST00000219476.9 NP_000539.2 P49815-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TSC2ENST00000219476.9 linkc.5116C>T p.Arg1706Cys missense_variant Exon 40 of 42 5 NM_000548.5 ENSP00000219476.3 P49815-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000289
AC:
44
AN:
152184
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000279
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000296
AC:
74
AN:
250408
AF XY:
0.000295
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000371
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000636
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000381
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000491
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000409
AC:
598
AN:
1460576
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000413
AC XY:
300
AN XY:
726624
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000149
AC:
5
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000514
AC:
23
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39694
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000192
AC:
1
AN:
52152
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000173
AC:
1
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000496
AC:
551
AN:
1111990
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000265
AC:
16
AN:
60380
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.475
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
39
78
116
155
194
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
22
44
66
88
110
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000289
AC:
44
AN:
152302
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000322
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000481
AC:
20
AN:
41564
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000261
AC:
4
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000279
AC:
19
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.518
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
8
11
14
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000795
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000287
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000349
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000264
AC:
32
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:11Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 2 Uncertain:1Benign:3
Nov 07, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 06, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. Homozygosity has been confirmed in one or more individuals. As homozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality, this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. -

Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 09, 2023
Revvity Omics, Revvity
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:4
Jul 20, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 17, 2018
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: TSC2 c.5116C>T (p.Arg1706Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Rap GTPase activating protein domain of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The observed variant frequency is approximately 4-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TSC2 causing Tuberous Sclerosis Complex phenotype (6.9e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. The variant, c.5116C>T, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (Jozwiak_2014). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. A functional study, Hoogeveen-Westerveld_2012, found the variant to act comparable to wild type protein and classified as probably neutral. An internal specimen reports the variant to co-occur with pathogenic FLCN, c.927_954dup28. Multiple ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant as "likely benign/benign." Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Jun 08, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 29, 2022
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Nov 03, 2021
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TSC2: BS1 -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Feb 11, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Oct 19, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:1Other:1
-
Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:curation

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

See cases Uncertain:1
Mar 17, 2022
Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Muenster
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ACMG categories: BP1 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.080
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.027
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.17
CADD
Benign
23
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.92
D;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;D;.;D
Eigen
Benign
-0.11
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.023
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.78
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.93
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.30
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.16
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.59
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
PhyloP100
3.1
PrimateAI
Benign
0.39
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.6
D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.68
Sift
Uncertain
0.027
D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0050
D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.;.;.;B;B;.;.;B;B;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.46
MVP
0.89
ClinPred
0.059
T
GERP RS
3.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.26
gMVP
0.56
Mutation Taster
=63/37
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45517391; hg19: chr16-2138096; COSMIC: COSV106054119; API