16-2091483-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001009944.3(PKD1):​c.11652C>T​(p.Ser3884=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000141 in 1,378,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00045 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

PKD1
NM_001009944.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, single submitter B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0420
Variant links:
Genes affected
PKD1 (HGNC:9008): (polycystin 1, transient receptor potential channel interacting) This gene encodes a member of the polycystin protein family. The encoded glycoprotein contains a large N-terminal extracellular region, multiple transmembrane domains and a cytoplasmic C-tail. It is an integral membrane protein that functions as a regulator of calcium permeable cation channels and intracellular calcium homoeostasis. It is also involved in cell-cell/matrix interactions and may modulate G-protein-coupled signal-transduction pathways. It plays a role in renal tubular development, and mutations in this gene cause autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease type 1 (ADPKD1). ADPKD1 is characterized by the growth of fluid-filled cysts that replace normal renal tissue and result in end-stage renal failure. Splice variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. Also, six pseudogenes, closely linked in a known duplicated region on chromosome 16p, have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
PKD1-AS1 (HGNC:56035): (PKD1 antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.64).
BP6
Variant 16-2091483-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2091483-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 434004.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars. Variant chr16-2091483-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.042 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000447 (67/149888) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0123 (63/5128). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00985. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 36 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 67 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PKD1NM_001009944.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.11652C>T p.Ser3884= synonymous_variant 42/46 ENST00000262304.9 NP_001009944.3
PKD1-AS1NR_135175.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.48G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PKD1ENST00000262304.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.11652C>T p.Ser3884= synonymous_variant 42/461 NM_001009944.3 ENSP00000262304 P5P98161-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000447
AC:
67
AN:
149780
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000665
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0122
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000623
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000612
AC:
24
AN:
39214
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000507
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
23678
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0103
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000832
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000103
AC:
127
AN:
1228158
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000895
AC XY:
54
AN XY:
603220
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00390
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000159
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000995
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000387
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000447
AC:
67
AN:
149888
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000492
AC XY:
36
AN XY:
73182
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000665
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0123
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000624
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000142
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000423

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Polycystic kidney disease, adult type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 07, 2019- -
Polycystic kidney disease Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The PKD1 p.Ser3884= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the ClinVar, LOVD 3.0, or PKD1-LOVD databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs377436997) as “With Uncertain significance allele”, and ADPKD Mutation Database (classified likely neutral). The variant was identified in control databases in 52 (2 homozygous) of 67022 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0008 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 1 of 1998 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), East Asian in 51 (2 homozygous) of 3682 chromosomes (freq: 0.01) while not observed in the African, Latino, European Non-Finnish, Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The variant was also identified by our laboratory in 1 individual with polycystic kidneys. The p.Ser3884= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.64
CADD
Benign
1.3
DANN
Benign
0.86
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs377436997; hg19: chr16-2141484; API