16-21705283-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_144672.4(OTOA):c.1095C>T(p.Gly365Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00182 in 1,613,868 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 53 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G365G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0098 ( 27 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00099 ( 26 hom. )

Consequence

OTOA
NM_144672.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.35

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOA (HGNC:16378): (otoancorin) The protein encoded by this gene is specifically expressed in the inner ear, and is located at the interface between the apical surface of the inner ear sensory epithelia and their overlying acellular gels. It is prposed that this protein is involved in the attachment of the inner ear acellular gels to the apical surface of the underlying nonsensory cells. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive deafness type 22 (DFNB22). Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

OTOA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 22
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

OTOA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP6

Variant 16-21705283-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-21705283-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 164817.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00979 (1490/152244) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0331 (1374/41536). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0316. There are 27 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 686 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 27 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOA	NM_144672.4 link	c.1095C>T	p.Gly365Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 12 of 29	ENST00000646100.2	NP_653273.3	Q05BM7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
OTOA	ENST00000646100.2 link	c.1095C>T	p.Gly365Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 12 of 29		NM_144672.4	ENSP00000496564.2		Q7RTW8-5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00981

AC:

1493

AN:

152126

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0332

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00557

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000235

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00670

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00269

AC:

676

AN:

251086

AF XY:

0.00196

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0357

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00188

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000168

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00147

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000993

AC:

1452

AN:

1461624

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000883

AC XY:

642

AN XY:

727114

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0328

AC:

1099

AN:

33472

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00233

AC:

104

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000812

AC:

AN:

86244

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53414

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00108

AC:

AN:

5570

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000899

AC:

100

AN:

1111998

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00225

AC:

136

AN:

60366

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.474

Heterozygous variant carriers

189

283

378

472

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

160

200

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00979

AC:

1490

AN:

152244

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00922

AC XY:

686

AN XY:

74428

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0331

AC:

1374

AN:

41536

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00549

AC:

AN:

15288

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5176

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10608

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000235

AC:

AN:

68018

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00663

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.504

Heterozygous variant carriers

136

203

271

339

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00353

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0114

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Jan 16, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

May 07, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Gly365Gly in Exon 11 of OTOA: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 3.5% (129/3738) of Af rican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs115543159). -

not provided

Benign:2

Dec 09, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.82

CADD

Benign

0.080

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.38

PhyloP100

-4.4

PromoterAI

-0.0082

Neutral

(source)

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.34

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

DS_DL_spliceai

0.34

Position offset: 9

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over