16-23367958-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000336.3(SCNN1B):c.879C>T(p.Phe293Phe) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0546 in 1,610,998 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,889 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000336.3 splice_region, synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0976 AC: 14846AN: 152096Hom.: 1201 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0563 AC: 14160AN: 251486Hom.: 733 AF XY: 0.0522 AC XY: 7100AN XY: 135914
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0501 AC: 73153AN: 1458784Hom.: 2686 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0489 AC XY: 35502AN XY: 725988
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0976 AC: 14862AN: 152214Hom.: 1203 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0969 AC XY: 7213AN XY: 74428
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:2
Phe293Phe in exon 05 of SCNN1B: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not predicted to alter splicing (0/5 programs). It has been identified in 20% (915/4394) of A frican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs250563). -
- -
Pseudohypoaldosteronism, type IB1, autosomal recessive Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Liddle syndrome 1 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Bronchiectasis with or without elevated sweat chloride 1 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at