16-23621419-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP6
The NM_024675.4(PALB2):āc.3056T>Cā(p.Val1019Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000013 in 1,614,032 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.0000075 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
PALB2
NM_024675.4 missense
NM_024675.4 missense
Scores
1
10
8
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.63
Genes affected
PALB2 (HGNC:26144): (partner and localizer of BRCA2) This gene encodes a protein that may function in tumor suppression. This protein binds to and colocalizes with the breast cancer 2 early onset protein (BRCA2) in nuclear foci and likely permits the stable intranuclear localization and accumulation of BRCA2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
BP6
Variant 16-23621419-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-23621419-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 126709.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=5}.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALB2 | NM_024675.4 | c.3056T>C | p.Val1019Ala | missense_variant | 10/13 | ENST00000261584.9 | NP_078951.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALB2 | ENST00000261584.9 | c.3056T>C | p.Val1019Ala | missense_variant | 10/13 | 1 | NM_024675.4 | ENSP00000261584.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
152204
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 251450Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135902
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
251450
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135902
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000752 AC: 11AN: 1461828Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 727222
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
1461828
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
727222
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74356
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
152204
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74356
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
AC:
5
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 31, 2023 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | curation | Leiden Open Variation Database | May 13, 2019 | Curators: Marc Tischkowitz, Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitter to LOVD: Marc Tischkowitz. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 01, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 13, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 28, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Jul 02, 2018 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Sep 20, 2023 | In the published literature, the variant has been reported in affected individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 21932393), as well as unspecified cancers (PMIDs:26689913 (2015) and 28873162 (2017)). Additionally, a functional study suggests that the variant is not damaging to PALB2 protein function (PMIDs: 26689913 (2015) and 31636395 (2020)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00024 (6/24966 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 29, 2024 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Published functional studies demonstrate homology-directed repair activity comparable to wildtype (PMID: 31636395); Observed in individuals with breast or ovarian cancer (PMID: 21932393, 26689913, 35264596); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21285249, 21932393, 19609323, 26689913, 28873162, 20871615, 24485656, 35264596, 31636395) - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 26, 2019 | Variant summary: PALB2 c.3056T>C (p.Val1019Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the WD40 domain that binds to the N-terminus of BRCA2 (IPR031920). Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.4e-05 in 251450 control chromosomes (gnomAD), exclusively found in the African subpopulation with a frequency of 0.00031 (5/16256). In addition, this variant has been reported in 4/2559 African American women who are older than age 70 and cancer free (in the FLOSSIES database), supporting a benign role for the variant. c.3056T>C has been also reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast or ovarian cancer (Zheng_2012, Lu_2015) and in at least one individual with advanced cancer, type not specified (Mandelker_2017), but without strong evidence for causality. Therefore these reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (PALB2 c.1479delC (p.Thr494LeufsX67) in an internal LCA sample), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
D;D
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
.;M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;D
Vest4
MVP
0.61
MPC
0.37
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at