16-23621451-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_024675.4(PALB2):c.3024C>T(p.Pro1008=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000112 in 1,613,774 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000011 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
PALB2
NM_024675.4 synonymous
NM_024675.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.114
Genes affected
PALB2 (HGNC:26144): (partner and localizer of BRCA2) This gene encodes a protein that may function in tumor suppression. This protein binds to and colocalizes with the breast cancer 2 early onset protein (BRCA2) in nuclear foci and likely permits the stable intranuclear localization and accumulation of BRCA2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant 16-23621451-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-23621451-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 126705.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-23621451-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.114 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALB2 | NM_024675.4 | c.3024C>T | p.Pro1008= | synonymous_variant | 10/13 | ENST00000261584.9 | NP_078951.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALB2 | ENST00000261584.9 | c.3024C>T | p.Pro1008= | synonymous_variant | 10/13 | 1 | NM_024675.4 | ENSP00000261584 | P1 | |
ENST00000561764.1 | n.420-2449G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152026Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152026
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251444Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135902
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
251444
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135902
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000109 AC: 16AN: 1461748Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000110 AC XY: 8AN XY: 727180
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
1461748
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
727180
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152026Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74258
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152026
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74258
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | curation | Leiden Open Variation Database | May 13, 2019 | Curators: Marc Tischkowitz, Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitters to LOVD: Marc Tischkowitz, Yukihide Momozawa. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 12, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 14, 2016 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 01, 2017 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The PALB2 p.Pro1008= variant was identified in 9 of 14234 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0006) from Italian families and Japanese women with breast cancer and was present in 15 of 11391 control chromosomes (frequency: 001) from healthy individuals (Papi 2010, Momozawa 2018). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs180177130) as “With Likely benign allele”, ClinVar (4x as likely benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Color, PALB2 database), LOVD 3.0 (4x as benign). The variant was identified in control databases in 1 of 246232 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000004 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: East Asian in 1 of 17248 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, European Non-Finnish, Ashkenazi Jewish, European Finnish or South Asian populations. The p.Pro1008= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at