16-23629926-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_024675.4(PALB2):​c.2228A>G​(p.Tyr743Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000152 in 1,614,154 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PALB2
NM_024675.4 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.18
Variant links:
Genes affected
PALB2 (HGNC:26144): (partner and localizer of BRCA2) This gene encodes a protein that may function in tumor suppression. This protein binds to and colocalizes with the breast cancer 2 early onset protein (BRCA2) in nuclear foci and likely permits the stable intranuclear localization and accumulation of BRCA2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008872062).
BP6
Variant 16-23629926-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-23629926-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 184708.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr16-23629926-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000162 (237/1461892) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00582 (231/39700). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0052. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 131 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PALB2NM_024675.4 linkc.2228A>G p.Tyr743Cys missense_variant Exon 5 of 13 ENST00000261584.9 NP_078951.2 Q86YC2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PALB2ENST00000261584.9 linkc.2228A>G p.Tyr743Cys missense_variant Exon 5 of 13 1 NM_024675.4 ENSP00000261584.4 Q86YC2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152144
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000835
AC:
21
AN:
251494
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000589
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
135922
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000162
AC:
237
AN:
1461892
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000180
AC XY:
131
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00582
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
8.99e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000662
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000525
AC:
8
AN:
152262
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000806
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000151
ExAC
AF:
0.000123
AC:
15

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 27, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Nov 10, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Feb 15, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: PALB2 c.2228A>G (p.Tyr743Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00075 in 313070 control chromosomes (gnomAD and publications), predominantly at a frequency of 0.0011 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 7 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in PALB2 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer phenotype (0.00016), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. Notably, the variant was detected at a frequency of 0.0170 in a large study of Japanese controls (Momozawa_2018), providing further supporting evidence for a benign role. c.2228A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals at risk or affected by Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer or pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (Momozawa_2018, Ohmoto_2018, Takeuchi_2018, Sato_2017, Balmana_2016, Nakagomi_2015, Ramus_2015, Thompson, 2015). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. A co-occurrence with a likely pathogenic variant has been reported in our internal database (MSH2 c.1511-1G>A). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Five ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign (3x) and twice as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2015
Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: case-control

- -

not provided Benign:2
Aug 09, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 30, 2019
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29802286, 26315354, 26283626, 29338689, 26411315, 25256751, 27621404, 28796317, 29667044, 32426482) -

Fanconi anemia complementation group N Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
May 04, 2022
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial pancreatic carcinoma Benign:1
Oct 12, 2023
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
May 01, 2019
Cancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.056
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.69
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
0.10
DANN
Benign
0.21
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0052
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0030
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.41
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0044
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0089
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.55
.;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.22
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.14
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.0030
Sift
Benign
0.19
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.23
T;T
Polyphen
0.0
.;B
Vest4
0.12
MVP
0.22
MPC
0.062
ClinPred
0.0058
T
GERP RS
0.42
Varity_R
0.043
gMVP
0.12

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141749524; hg19: chr16-23641247; COSMIC: COSV55161798; API