16-23630293-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_024675.4(PALB2):c.1861C>A(p.Pro621Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000103 in 1,461,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P621S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024675.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- Fanconi anemia complementation group NInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 3Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancerInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000398 AC: 10AN: 251338 AF XY: 0.0000442 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000103 AC: 15AN: 1461884Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000110 AC XY: 8AN XY: 727240 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
This missense variant replaces proline with threonine at codon 621 of the PALB2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function. Functional studies have been reported this variant had increased the binding affinity to the protein to MRG1 (PMID: 34946951). This variant has been reported in one individual affected with breast cancer in the literature (PMID: 25636233) and it also has been detected in two breast cancer case-control studies where it was found in an unaffected individual and absent in breast cancer cases, including in a large breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 0/60466 cases and 1/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 31206626, 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID PALB2_010968). This variant has been identified in 10/251338 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
- -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1Benign:2
- -
This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -
- -
not specified Uncertain:2
Variant summary: PALB2 c.1861C>A (p.Pro621Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1861C>A has been reported in the literature in at-least one individual affected with Breast Cancer (Leyton_2015), but it has also been reported in healthy controls (Weitzel_2019; PMID: 33471991, LOVD). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. A co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant has been reported via internal testing (ATM c.4236+1G>T). Experimental evidence demonstrated the variant increased the binding affinity of the protein to MRG15 (Morf-related gene on chromosome 15), which is part of many transcription complexes (Redington_2021). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 245656). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
- -
not provided Uncertain:2
The PALB2 c.1861C>A (p.Pro621Thr) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with breast cancer (PMIDs: 25636233 (2015), 34946951 (2021) and unaffected controls (PMIDs: 31206626 (2019) and 33471991 (2021)). A functional study found that this variant increased binding affinity to the MRG15 protein (PMID: 34946951 (2021)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00023 (8/34592 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27842325, 25636233, 22941656, 34946951, 31658756) -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at