Menu
GeneBe

16-23635352-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_024675.4(PALB2):​c.1194G>A​(p.Val398=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00147 in 1,613,992 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V398V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00098 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

PALB2
NM_024675.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:27

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.45
Variant links:
Genes affected
PALB2 (HGNC:26144): (partner and localizer of BRCA2) This gene encodes a protein that may function in tumor suppression. This protein binds to and colocalizes with the breast cancer 2 early onset protein (BRCA2) in nuclear foci and likely permits the stable intranuclear localization and accumulation of BRCA2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 16-23635352-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-23635352-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 126592.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=5, Likely_benign=12, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr16-23635352-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr16-23635352-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PALB2NM_024675.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1194G>A p.Val398= synonymous_variant 4/13 ENST00000261584.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PALB2ENST00000261584.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1194G>A p.Val398= synonymous_variant 4/131 NM_024675.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000985
AC:
150
AN:
152210
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000555
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000864
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000741
AC:
186
AN:
250886
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000745
AC XY:
101
AN XY:
135610
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000549
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000893
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000465
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000816
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00152
AC:
2227
AN:
1461664
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00147
AC XY:
1069
AN XY:
727148
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000209
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000492
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000957
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00187
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00141
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000985
AC:
150
AN:
152328
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000832
AC XY:
62
AN XY:
74494
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000553
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000864
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.00125
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000945

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:27
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:11
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 11, 2016Variant summary: Variant Summary: The c.1194G>A (p.Val398=) in PALB2 gene is a synonymous change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide with a prediction of being a "disease-causing" by mutation taster. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at an overall allele frequency of 0.073% (88/121172 chrs tested), mainly in individuals of European descent (0.1154%; 77/66698 chrs tested). The observed frequency exceeds the maximum expected allele frequency for a pathogenic PALB2 variant (0.015%), suggesting that it is a common polymorphism. Based on the published reports, the variant of interest was found in affected individuals as well as in unaffected controls without personal or family history of cancer. Lastly, the variant has been reported as Benign by multiple reputable database/clinical laboratories. Taken together, the variant was classified as Benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJan 12, 2017- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2024PALB2: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesAug 25, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedcurationLeiden Open Variation DatabaseMay 13, 2019Curators: Marc Tischkowitz, Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitter to LOVD: Marc Tischkowitz. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 01, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoMar 18, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoOct 26, 2020- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsNov 19, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Mar 08, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 13, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 16, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercase-controlCancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreJun 01, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterMar 06, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioApr 25, 2023- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group N Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The PALB2 p.Val398= variant was identified in 10 of 7040 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast and ovarian cancers of Spanish, Italian, German, and Australian nationalities and was present in 9 of 6464 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from healthy individuals (Blanco 2012, Catucci 2014, Hellebrand 2011, Thompson 2015). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs61755173) as “with Likely benign, other allele”, in ClinVar and Clinvitae databases as benign by Invitae, GeneDx, PALB2 database and likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Illumina Clinical Services; and identified 2X in the LOVD 3.0 database. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, Zhejiang Colon Cancer databases. The variant was identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 4 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0008) and in the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project in 20 of 8600 European American African alleles. In addition, the variant was identified in control databases in 212 of 276616 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0008 in the following populations: African in 9 of 24030 chromosomes (freq. 0.0004), Latino in 19 of 34416 chromosomes (freq. 0.0006), European Non-Finnish in 170 of 126264 chromosomes (freq. 0.001), Ashkenazi Jewish in 9 of 10148 chromosomes (freq. 0.0009), European Finnish in 1 of 25660 chromosomes (freq. 0.00004), and Other in 4 of 6454 chromosomes (freq. 0.0006) but was not seen in East Asian and South Asian POP populations increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Val398= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
6.6
DANN
Benign
0.53

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61755173; hg19: chr16-23646673; COSMIC: COSV104552868; COSMIC: COSV104552868; API