16-23635352-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_024675.4(PALB2):c.1194G>A(p.Val398=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00147 in 1,613,992 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00098 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
PALB2
NM_024675.4 synonymous
NM_024675.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.45
Genes affected
PALB2 (HGNC:26144): (partner and localizer of BRCA2) This gene encodes a protein that may function in tumor suppression. This protein binds to and colocalizes with the breast cancer 2 early onset protein (BRCA2) in nuclear foci and likely permits the stable intranuclear localization and accumulation of BRCA2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 16-23635352-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-23635352-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 126592.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=12, Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr16-23635352-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr16-23635352-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALB2 | NM_024675.4 | c.1194G>A | p.Val398= | synonymous_variant | 4/13 | ENST00000261584.9 | NP_078951.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALB2 | ENST00000261584.9 | c.1194G>A | p.Val398= | synonymous_variant | 4/13 | 1 | NM_024675.4 | ENSP00000261584 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000985 AC: 150AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
150
AN:
152210
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000741 AC: 186AN: 250886Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000745 AC XY: 101AN XY: 135610
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
186
AN:
250886
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
101
AN XY:
135610
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00152 AC: 2227AN: 1461664Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00147 AC XY: 1069AN XY: 727148
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2227
AN:
1461664
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1069
AN XY:
727148
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000985 AC: 150AN: 152328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000832 AC XY: 62AN XY: 74494
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
150
AN:
152328
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
62
AN XY:
74494
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:27
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:11
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | curation | Leiden Open Variation Database | May 13, 2019 | Curators: Marc Tischkowitz, Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitter to LOVD: Marc Tischkowitz. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 11, 2016 | Variant summary: Variant Summary: The c.1194G>A (p.Val398=) in PALB2 gene is a synonymous change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide with a prediction of being a "disease-causing" by mutation taster. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at an overall allele frequency of 0.073% (88/121172 chrs tested), mainly in individuals of European descent (0.1154%; 77/66698 chrs tested). The observed frequency exceeds the maximum expected allele frequency for a pathogenic PALB2 variant (0.015%), suggesting that it is a common polymorphism. Based on the published reports, the variant of interest was found in affected individuals as well as in unaffected controls without personal or family history of cancer. Lastly, the variant has been reported as Benign by multiple reputable database/clinical laboratories. Taken together, the variant was classified as Benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 25, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 12, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | PALB2: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
not specified Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Oct 26, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 01, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 18, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 16, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 13, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Nov 19, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 08, 2021 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | case-control | Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre | Jun 01, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Mar 06, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group N Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Apr 25, 2023 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The PALB2 p.Val398= variant was identified in 10 of 7040 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast and ovarian cancers of Spanish, Italian, German, and Australian nationalities and was present in 9 of 6464 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from healthy individuals (Blanco 2012, Catucci 2014, Hellebrand 2011, Thompson 2015). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs61755173) as “with Likely benign, other allele”, in ClinVar and Clinvitae databases as benign by Invitae, GeneDx, PALB2 database and likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Illumina Clinical Services; and identified 2X in the LOVD 3.0 database. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, Zhejiang Colon Cancer databases. The variant was identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 4 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0008) and in the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project in 20 of 8600 European American African alleles. In addition, the variant was identified in control databases in 212 of 276616 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0008 in the following populations: African in 9 of 24030 chromosomes (freq. 0.0004), Latino in 19 of 34416 chromosomes (freq. 0.0006), European Non-Finnish in 170 of 126264 chromosomes (freq. 0.001), Ashkenazi Jewish in 9 of 10148 chromosomes (freq. 0.0009), European Finnish in 1 of 25660 chromosomes (freq. 0.00004), and Other in 4 of 6454 chromosomes (freq. 0.0006) but was not seen in East Asian and South Asian POP populations increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Val398= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at