16-28477461-G-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_001042432.2(CLN3):c.*55C>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000701 in 1,609,964 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00066 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00071 ( 11 hom. )
Consequence
CLN3
NM_001042432.2 3_prime_UTR
NM_001042432.2 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00008658
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.784
Genes affected
CLN3 (HGNC:2074): (CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein, battenin) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in lysosomal function. Mutations in this, as well as other neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinosis (CLN) genes, cause neurodegenerative diseases commonly known as Batten disease or collectively known as neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs). Many alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 11 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLN3 | NM_001042432.2 | c.*55C>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000636147.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLN3 | ENST00000636147.2 | c.*55C>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 16/16 | 1 | NM_001042432.2 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000657 AC: 100AN: 152166Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
100
AN:
152166
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000706 AC: 1029AN: 1457680Hom.: 11 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000723 AC XY: 524AN XY: 725116
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1029
AN:
1457680
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
524
AN XY:
725116
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000657 AC: 100AN: 152284Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000671 AC XY: 50AN XY: 74462
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
100
AN:
152284
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
50
AN XY:
74462
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinosis, Dominant/Recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai
Position offset: 3
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at