16-28477461-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_001042432.2(CLN3):​c.*55C>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000701 in 1,609,964 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00066 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00071 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

CLN3
NM_001042432.2 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00008658
2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.784

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CLN3 (HGNC:2074): (CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein, battenin) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in lysosomal function. Mutations in this, as well as other neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinosis (CLN) genes, cause neurodegenerative diseases commonly known as Batten disease or collectively known as neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs). Many alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
CLN3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • inherited retinal dystrophy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000706 (1029/1457680) while in subpopulation MID AF = 0.00142 (6/4214). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00062. There are 11 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 524 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 11 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CLN3NM_001042432.2 linkc.*55C>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 16 of 16 ENST00000636147.2 NP_001035897.1 Q13286-1A0A024QZB8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CLN3ENST00000636147.2 linkc.*55C>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 16 of 16 1 NM_001042432.2 ENSP00000490105.1 Q13286-1
ENSG00000261832ENST00000637378.1 linkc.228+4644C>A intron_variant Intron 4 of 9 5 ENSP00000490831.1 A0A1B0GW90

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000657
AC:
100
AN:
152166
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000328
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0205
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000706
AC:
1029
AN:
1457680
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000723
AC XY:
524
AN XY:
725116
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000210
AC:
7
AN:
33392
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000828
AC:
37
AN:
44698
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0258
AC:
674
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39686
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000349
AC:
3
AN:
85922
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52340
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
6
AN:
4214
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000181
AC:
201
AN:
1111118
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00168
AC:
101
AN:
60186
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
60
121
181
242
302
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
24
48
72
96
120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000657
AC:
100
AN:
152284
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000671
AC XY:
50
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000481
AC:
2
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000327
AC:
5
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0205
AC:
71
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000265
AC:
18
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.482
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
9
13
18
22
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000966
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000937
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinosis, Dominant/Recessive Uncertain:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.40
PhyloP100
-0.78
Mutation Taster
=90/10
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000087
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.67
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai
0.67
Position offset: 3

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199979207; hg19: chr16-28488782; API