16-28477487-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong

The NM_001042432.2(CLN3):​c.*29A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000473 in 1,459,798 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000047 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CLN3
NM_001042432.2 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0210
Variant links:
Genes affected
CLN3 (HGNC:2074): (CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein, battenin) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in lysosomal function. Mutations in this, as well as other neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinosis (CLN) genes, cause neurodegenerative diseases commonly known as Batten disease or collectively known as neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs). Many alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CLN3NM_001042432.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*29A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant 16/16 ENST00000636147.2 NP_001035897.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CLN3ENST00000636147.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*29A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant 16/161 NM_001042432.2 ENSP00000490105 P1Q13286-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000359
AC:
9
AN:
250786
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135526
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000792
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000473
AC:
69
AN:
1459798
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000551
AC XY:
40
AN XY:
726108
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000996
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Alfa
AF:
0.0000712
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000189

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicMay 02, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinosis, Dominant/Recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.88
CADD
Benign
1.3
DANN
Benign
0.44

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs778438984; hg19: chr16-28488808; API