16-28477487-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001042432.2(CLN3):c.*29A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000473 in 1,459,798 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000047 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CLN3
NM_001042432.2 3_prime_UTR
NM_001042432.2 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0210
Genes affected
CLN3 (HGNC:2074): (CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein, battenin) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in lysosomal function. Mutations in this, as well as other neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinosis (CLN) genes, cause neurodegenerative diseases commonly known as Batten disease or collectively known as neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs). Many alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLN3 | NM_001042432.2 | c.*29A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000636147.2 | NP_001035897.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLN3 | ENST00000636147.2 | c.*29A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 16/16 | 1 | NM_001042432.2 | ENSP00000490105 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000359 AC: 9AN: 250786Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135526
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
250786
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135526
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000473 AC: 69AN: 1459798Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000551 AC XY: 40AN XY: 726108
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
69
AN:
1459798
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
40
AN XY:
726108
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | May 02, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinosis, Dominant/Recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at