16-51139023-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_002968.3(SALL1):c.3199C>T(p.Leu1067Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000372 in 1,614,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002968.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SALL1 | NM_002968.3 | c.3199C>T | p.Leu1067Phe | missense_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000251020.9 | NP_002959.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SALL1 | ENST00000251020.9 | c.3199C>T | p.Leu1067Phe | missense_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_002968.3 | ENSP00000251020 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251470Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135910
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461894Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74344
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Townes-Brocks syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Nov 29, 2021 | - - |
Townes syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 06, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at