16-53671541-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7

The NM_015272.5(RPGRIP1L):​c.1072T>C​(p.Leu358Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00135 in 1,579,218 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00095 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RPGRIP1L
NM_015272.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.19

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RPGRIP1L (HGNC:29168): (RPGRIP1 like) The protein encoded by this gene can localize to the basal body-centrosome complex or to primary cilia and centrosomes in ciliated cells. The encoded protein has been found to interact with nephrocystin-4. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome type 7 (JBTS7) and Meckel syndrome type 5 (MKS5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2016]
RPGRIP1L Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Meckel syndrome, type 5
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Joubert syndrome 7
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • COACH syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Joubert syndrome with renal defect
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Meckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).
BP6
Variant 16-53671541-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-53671541-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 260597.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.19 with no splicing effect.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_015272.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
RPGRIP1L
NM_015272.5
MANE Select
c.1072T>Cp.Leu358Leu
synonymous
Exon 9 of 27NP_056087.2
RPGRIP1L
NM_001330538.2
c.1072T>Cp.Leu358Leu
synonymous
Exon 9 of 26NP_001317467.1
RPGRIP1L
NM_001308334.3
c.1072T>Cp.Leu358Leu
synonymous
Exon 9 of 26NP_001295263.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
RPGRIP1L
ENST00000647211.2
MANE Select
c.1072T>Cp.Leu358Leu
synonymous
Exon 9 of 27ENSP00000493946.1
RPGRIP1L
ENST00000563746.5
TSL:1
c.1072T>Cp.Leu358Leu
synonymous
Exon 9 of 26ENSP00000457889.1
RPGRIP1L
ENST00000621565.5
TSL:1
c.1072T>Cp.Leu358Leu
synonymous
Exon 9 of 26ENSP00000480698.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000946
AC:
144
AN:
152152
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000565
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00190
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00117
AC:
291
AN:
249498
AF XY:
0.00108
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000248
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000987
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00140
AC:
1993
AN:
1427066
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
26
AF XY:
0.00128
AC XY:
910
AN XY:
711970
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000183
AC:
6
AN:
32760
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000898
AC:
4
AN:
44530
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25840
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39320
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000352
AC:
3
AN:
85132
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00100
AC:
53
AN:
52806
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000182
AC:
1
AN:
5488
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00173
AC:
1871
AN:
1082032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000930
AC:
55
AN:
59158
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.426
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
78
155
233
310
388
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
64
128
192
256
320
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000946
AC:
144
AN:
152152
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000875
AC XY:
65
AN XY:
74328
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000145
AC:
6
AN:
41450
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000655
AC:
1
AN:
15268
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5202
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000415
AC:
2
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000565
AC:
6
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00190
AC:
129
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2090
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
7
14
22
29
36
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00106
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000888

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:2
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joubert syndrome 7 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

Meckel syndrome, type 5 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

Nephronophthisis 8 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome Benign:1
Jan 17, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.46
CADD
Benign
9.0
DANN
Benign
0.81
PhyloP100
1.2
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147295026; hg19: chr16-53705453; API