16-53686570-G-T

Variant names:

• chr16-53686570-G-T
• rs376808910
• NM_015272.5:c.639C>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2 BP4_Moderate

The NM_015272.5(RPGRIP1L):​c.639C>A​(p.Asn213Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N213S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

• Frequency: Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
• Consequence: RPGRIP1L NM_015272.5 missense
• Clinical Significance: Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:3
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 1.68
• Publications: 1 publications found

Genes affected

RPGRIP1L (HGNC:29168): (RPGRIP1 like) The protein encoded by this gene can localize to the basal body-centrosome complex or to primary cilia and centrosomes in ciliated cells. The encoded protein has been found to interact with nephrocystin-4. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome type 7 (JBTS7) and Meckel syndrome type 5 (MKS5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2016]

RPGRIP1L Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

• Meckel syndrome, type 5

  Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
• Joubert syndrome 7

  Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
• COACH syndrome 1

  Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• Joubert syndrome with renal defect

  Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• Meckel syndrome

  Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

ACMG classification

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.

• PM2: Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage
• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.15967205).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RPGRIP1L	NM_015272.5	c.639C>A	p.Asn213Lys	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 27	ENST00000647211.2	NP_056087.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RPGRIP1L	ENST00000647211.2	c.639C>A	p.Asn213Lys	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 27		NM_015272.5	ENSP00000493946.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32

GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32

GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32

TwinsUK AF: 0.000270 AC: 1

ALSPAC AF: 0.00 AC: 0

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Joubert syndrome 7 Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Meckel syndrome, type 5 Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Nephronophthisis 8 Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.23
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.070	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.34
CADD	Benign	19
DANN	Uncertain	0.99
DEOGEN2	Benign	0.045	.;.;T;.;.;.;.
Eigen	Benign	-0.31
Eigen_PC	Benign	-0.19
FATHMM_MKL	Benign	0.70	D
LIST_S2	Benign	0.86	D;.;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP	Benign	0.050	D
MetaRNN	Benign	0.16	T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM	Benign	-0.77	T
MutationAssessor	Uncertain	2.0	M;M;.;M;.;.;.
PhyloP100		1.7
PrimateAI	Uncertain	0.56	T
PROVEAN	Uncertain	-2.5	N;.;.;D;N;N;D
REVEL	Benign	0.077
Sift	Benign	0.063	T;.;.;D;D;D;D
Sift4G	Benign	0.43	T;.;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen		0.76	P;B;.;B;.;.;.
Vest4		0.46
MutPred		0.22		Gain of methylation at N213 (P = 0.0085);Gain of methylation at N213 (P = 0.0085);Gain of methylation at N213 (P = 0.0085);Gain of methylation at N213 (P = 0.0085);Gain of methylation at N213 (P = 0.0085);Gain of methylation at N213 (P = 0.0085);Gain of methylation at N213 (P = 0.0085);
MVP		0.65
MPC		0.15
ClinPred		0.88	D
GERP RS		3.5
Varity_R		0.15
gMVP		0.32
Mutation Taster		=84/16	polymorphism

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.030		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs376808910; hg19: chr16-53720482;