16-56484848-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_031885.5(BBS2):c.2079G>A(p.Gln693Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000863 in 1,613,970 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00065 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00089 ( 15 hom. )

Consequence

BBS2
NM_031885.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.243

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BBS2 (HGNC:967): (Bardet-Biedl syndrome 2) This gene is a member of the Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) gene family. Bardet-Biedl syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by severe pigmentary retinopathy, obesity, polydactyly, renal malformation and cognitive disability. The proteins encoded by BBS gene family members are structurally diverse and the similar phenotypes exhibited by mutations in BBS gene family members is likely due to their shared roles in cilia formation and function. Many BBS proteins localize to the basal bodies, ciliary axonemes, and pericentriolar regions of cells. BBS proteins may also be involved in intracellular trafficking via microtubule-related transport. The protein encoded by this gene forms a multiprotein BBSome complex with seven other BBS proteins.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2014]

BBS2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health
ciliopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
retinitis pigmentosa 74
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
retinitis pigmentosa
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Bardet-Biedl syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

BBS2 links:

ENSG00000288725 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000288725 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).

BP6

Variant 16-56484848-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-56484848-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 319849.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.243 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00065 (99/152298) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.016 (83/5180). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0132. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 61 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 15 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BBS2	NM_031885.5 link	c.2079G>A	p.Gln693Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 17 of 17	ENST00000245157.11	NP_114091.4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BBS2	ENST00000245157.11 link	c.2079G>A	p.Gln693Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 17 of 17	1	NM_031885.5	ENSP00000245157.5
ENSG00000288725	ENST00000684388.1 link	n.999G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 8 of 14			ENSP00000507647.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000651

AC:

AN:

152180

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000577

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0160

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000943

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00156

AC:

392

AN:

251310

AF XY:

0.00133

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000695

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0184

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000924

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000106

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000490

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000885

AC:

1294

AN:

1461672

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000842

AC XY:

612

AN XY:

727152

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33470

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44716

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000842

AC:

AN:

26124

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0271

AC:

1075

AN:

39678

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000893

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000562

AC:

AN:

53402

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000612

AC:

AN:

1111880

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000778

AC:

AN:

60382

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.474

Heterozygous variant carriers

130

196

261

326

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000650

AC:

AN:

152298

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000819

AC XY:

AN XY:

74466

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41568

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0160

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000414

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000943

AC:

AN:

10606

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000103

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000946

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.506

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000258

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000665

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0110

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 06, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 2

Benign:2

Dec 03, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Retinal dystrophy

Benign:1

Oct 01, 2023

Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:research

- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.42

CADD

Benign

4.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.69

PhyloP100

0.24

Mutation Taster

=96/4

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over