Menu
GeneBe

16-56865271-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_001126108.2(SLC12A3):c.36C>T(p.Asp12=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00102 in 1,613,886 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00060 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

SLC12A3
NM_001126108.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.44
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC12A3 (HGNC:10912): (solute carrier family 12 member 3) This gene encodes a renal thiazide-sensitive sodium-chloride cotransporter that is important for electrolyte homeostasis. This cotransporter mediates sodium and chloride reabsorption in the distal convoluted tubule. Mutations in this gene cause Gitelman syndrome, a disease similar to Bartter's syndrome, that is characterized by hypokalemic alkalosis combined with hypomagnesemia, low urinary calcium, and increased renin activity associated with normal blood pressure. This cotransporter is the target for thiazide diuretics that are used for treating high blood pressure. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.7).
BP6
Variant 16-56865271-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-56865271-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 319887.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr16-56865271-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr16-56865271-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.44 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SLC12A3NM_001126108.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.36C>T p.Asp12= synonymous_variant 1/26 ENST00000563236.6
SLC12A3NM_000339.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.36C>T p.Asp12= synonymous_variant 1/26
SLC12A3NM_001126107.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.36C>T p.Asp12= synonymous_variant 1/26
SLC12A3NM_001410896.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.36C>T p.Asp12= synonymous_variant 1/26

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SLC12A3ENST00000563236.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.36C>T p.Asp12= synonymous_variant 1/261 NM_001126108.2 A1P55017-1
SLC12A3ENST00000438926.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.36C>T p.Asp12= synonymous_variant 1/261 A1P55017-2
SLC12A3ENST00000566786.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.36C>T p.Asp12= synonymous_variant 1/261 P4P55017-3
SLC12A3ENST00000262502.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.36C>T p.Asp12= synonymous_variant 1/265 A1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000598
AC:
91
AN:
152240
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000643
AC:
161
AN:
250400
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000583
AC XY:
79
AN XY:
135578
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000617
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000231
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000490
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00106
AC:
1548
AN:
1461528
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00101
AC XY:
735
AN XY:
727078
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000149
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000170
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00133
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000795
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000597
AC:
91
AN:
152358
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000550
AC XY:
41
AN XY:
74500
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000144
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00130
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000782
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00136
EpiControl
AF:
0.00107

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial hypokalemia-hypomagnesemia Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jun 03, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 15, 2021- -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.70
Cadd
Benign
12
Dann
Benign
0.72

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs117987946; hg19: chr16-56899183; API