16-57655473-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_201525.4(ADGRG1):ā€‹c.843C>Gā€‹(p.Ser281Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.525 in 1,613,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 231,092 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.62 ( 30963 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 0.52 ( 200129 hom. )

Consequence

ADGRG1
NM_201525.4 missense

Scores

17

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.57
Variant links:
Genes affected
ADGRG1 (HGNC:4512): (adhesion G protein-coupled receptor G1) This gene encodes a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family and regulates brain cortical patterning. The encoded protein binds specifically to transglutaminase 2, a component of tissue and tumor stroma implicated as an inhibitor of tumor progression. Mutations in this gene are associated with a brain malformation known as bilateral frontoparietal polymicrogyria. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=1.2816151E-6).
BP6
Variant 16-57655473-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-57655473-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137493.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-57655473-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.824 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
ADGRG1NM_201525.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.843C>G p.Ser281Arg missense_variant 6/14 ENST00000562631.7 NP_958933.1 Q9Y653-2A0A0S2Z517

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ADGRG1ENST00000562631.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.843C>G p.Ser281Arg missense_variant 6/141 NM_201525.4 ENSP00000455351.2 Q9Y653-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.620
AC:
94104
AN:
151866
Hom.:
30924
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.825
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.609
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.649
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.514
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.845
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.574
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.602
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.456
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.485
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.580
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.595
AC:
149196
AN:
250900
Hom.:
46729
AF XY:
0.579
AC XY:
78507
AN XY:
135698
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.838
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.744
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.515
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.855
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.566
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.596
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.489
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.557
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.515
AC:
752706
AN:
1461204
Hom.:
200129
Cov.:
46
AF XY:
0.514
AC XY:
373892
AN XY:
726926
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.838
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.737
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.515
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.814
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.559
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.583
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.478
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.533
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.620
AC:
94203
AN:
151982
Hom.:
30963
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.627
AC XY:
46534
AN XY:
74248
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.824
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.649
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.514
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.844
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.572
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.602
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.485
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.584
Alfa
AF:
0.494
Hom.:
11328
Bravo
AF:
0.637
TwinsUK
AF:
0.481
AC:
1784
ALSPAC
AF:
0.471
AC:
1814
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.824
AC:
3624
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.493
AC:
4241
ExAC
AF:
0.591
AC:
71777
Asia WGS
AF:
0.729
AC:
2535
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.488
EpiControl
AF:
0.496

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 12, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 30, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoMar 07, 2013- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMay 06, 2018- -
Bilateral frontoparietal polymicrogyria Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.055
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.74
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
CADD
Benign
0.0060
DANN
Benign
0.20
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.071
.;T;T;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-2.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0035
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.27
.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0000013
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
PrimateAI
Benign
0.32
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.54
N;N;N;N;.;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.019
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T;T;T;.;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;B;B;B;.;B;B;B
Vest4
0.049
MutPred
0.14
Loss of phosphorylation at S281 (P = 0.0193);Loss of phosphorylation at S281 (P = 0.0193);Loss of phosphorylation at S281 (P = 0.0193);Loss of phosphorylation at S281 (P = 0.0193);.;Loss of phosphorylation at S281 (P = 0.0193);Loss of phosphorylation at S281 (P = 0.0193);Loss of phosphorylation at S281 (P = 0.0193);
ClinPred
0.0083
T
GERP RS
-6.2
Varity_R
0.027
gMVP
0.31

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1801257; hg19: chr16-57689385; COSMIC: COSV65636299; COSMIC: COSV65636299; API