16-58280459-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001305173.2(PRSS54):c.953G>A(p.Arg318Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000205 in 1,461,874 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R318T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001305173.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRSS54 | NM_001305173.2 | c.953G>A | p.Arg318Lys | missense_variant | Exon 7 of 7 | ENST00000567164.6 | NP_001292102.1 | |
CFAP263 | NM_014157.4 | c.*682C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 9 of 9 | ENST00000219299.8 | NP_054876.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRSS54 | ENST00000567164.6 | c.953G>A | p.Arg318Lys | missense_variant | Exon 7 of 7 | 1 | NM_001305173.2 | ENSP00000455024.1 | ||
CCDC113 | ENST00000219299.8 | c.*682C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 9 of 9 | 1 | NM_014157.4 | ENSP00000219299.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000402 AC: 1AN: 249008Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000742 AC XY: 1AN XY: 134788
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000205 AC: 3AN: 1461874Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at